• 12

Panasonic - 電漿仍然是最佳的電視技術!

Panasonic:Plasma is still the best TV technology
In Depth Pioneer Kuro DNA is at the heart of the new range

Panasonic - 電漿仍然是最佳的電視技術!


If you're buying a new TV and care more about picture quality than anything else, plasma is still definitely the best TV tech to go for.

That's the view of Fabrice Estornel, the head of Panasonic's TV business in the UK.

Panasonic has just launched a huge new range of both plasma and best-ever LED TVs, but the Japanese brand is still absolutely convinced that plasma offers the ultimate picture for both sports and movie fans.

"Let's be clear," said Estornel in an exclusive interview with TechRadar. "Maybe we accept that the entry level on plasma is becoming more a niche market. But there are still lots of people who are really into picture quality and home cinema.

"Many watch movies in ambient rooms. It's not like LED which is bright and more in your face, which a lot of people like. But with plasma it's a different kind of appreciation for the TV experience. So for sports and movie it's still the best technology."


Unlike LCD TVs which use an array of LEDs to illuminate their pixels, plasma TVs use glass panels containing over two million tiny cells filled with a mixture of inert gases. An electric current passed through these cells excites the gases, causing them to illuminate the pixels across the screen.

This method of lighting is traditionally a lot better for motion reproduction, contrast levels and reducing 3D crosstalk than LCD tech. But they do suffer from a lack of brightness and come with bulkier chassis than their LED cousins.

Panasonic is now the only major brand producing full ranges of plasma TVs, and though the undisputed king of plasma (Pioneer) couldn't make the tech pay financially, Panasonic believes plasma is only now coming of age as a display technology.

"To compare our new plasma TVs to the Pioneer Kuro is almost an unfair comparison, because there's been no development or new products from Pioneer in the last three, four or five years. It's no secret that a lot of engineers moved from Pioneer to Panasonic so we get something from this experience, but at that time the plasma market was in a different situation.

"There was more volume and it was probably more difficult. But the good thing is we waited for the technology to be at an affordable price. So that's where we reach the right balance now, where you've got the best picture quality - better than the Kuro - at a price which is a lot more affordable."

At an event attended by TechRadar in Nice, France this week, Panasonic has launched the European version of its bench-setting ZT60 plasma TV – dubbed "beyond reference" – and Estornel believes it's probably the best TV on the planet in terms of sheer picture quality.

"It's clear when you look at a product like the ZT it's superior to what the latest generation gave and so it should be anyway. That's the way that technology goes, Kuro was a great product at that time, but now there's better on the market."


2013-04-07 22:05 發佈

ahph_gmail wrote:
Panasonic:...(恕刪)

既然你懂意思!為什麼不翻譯文章內容!你當大家的造詣都很高?
我自認沒這麼懂!
自家在賣的東西當然要說好,難道要說壞嗎?只能說現在新款電漿確實不錯,但現在液晶也非小咖,想全面超越以LED背光為大宗的LCD,其實還有很遠的路要走。
既然如此

為什麼大家都要把它丟給你
行至水窮處,與人云亦云。〔薪水是零元,還活得下去〕。

水云 wrote:
既然如此為什麼大家都...(恕刪)


因為成本過高價格降不下來嗎

狼0226 wrote:
因為成本過高價格降不下來嗎

因為已無進步空間
行至水窮處,與人云亦云。〔薪水是零元,還活得下去〕。

水云 wrote:
因為已無進步空間...(恕刪)


+1
BINGO
老狗已經玩不出把戲
但是這東西
又像雞肋一樣
食之無味棄之可惜
這就是目前松下的心態
世界末日趕快到來吧............!^_*
若耗電量可跟液晶電視比擬的話~~~接受度會好些
LL: "LCD 才是最棒的, 要大能大, 要小就小"
OO: "OLED 才是最讚的...電漿/LCD的技術遠遠落後"
CC: "CRT 風雲再起, 其他的都給我靠邊站...4K2K TV 只要半坪的空間~"
PP: "P大哥來了! 100吋以下的都讓開!!!"
II: "來到我愛瑪克司這兒, 就知道那些玩具只能放在家裡面自 High..."
figo1958 wrote:
若耗電量可跟液晶電視...(恕刪)

同尺寸耗電量高低
CCFL背光液晶 > 電漿=直下式LED背光液晶 > 測光式LED背光液晶

其他網友也測過了 一年電費差不到幾十元的電費 真的是不考慮電漿的理由

若在乎畫質表現 那目前液晶沒有幾款能跟電漿打平的

若講色階數 會影響畫質的漸層表現的 液晶陣營更是完全不敢把這項資訊公布 因為很難看

若講反應時間 最頂級的液晶也是電漿反應時間的100倍慢

若講動態解像度 越大尺寸解像度差的話 看動態影響拖影會更明顯 電漿有2000條 液晶陣營也是完全不敢把這項規格公布 因為很難看

一生當中,至少要擁有過一台電漿電視或OLED電視。
  • 12
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 12)
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?