Candywayne wrote:
證實了廣告的效力電漿...(恕刪)
還是要看過才知道
1.目前看來NeoPDP面板本身還是灰的,在亮處觀賞會影響對比
2.聽說有油畫感,讓我想到之前看KURO的浮動噪點頗多
3.色割現象不知有無改善,下面有提到"ghost image"
這邊有評測NeoPDP優缺點
http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/panasonic-tx-p42g10-tx-p42g10b-20090415146.htm
TX-P42G10 Review Conclusion
Pros
Exceptional black level that rivals that on an entry-level 8G Pioneer Kuro PDP-4280XD
Revealing shadow detail delineation
Fantastic motion clarity even with [Intelligent Frame Creation] disabled
Handles 1080p/24 signals correctly without telecine judder
Very effective video-based jaggies reduction
High quality upscaling of standard-def progressive video signals
Natural-looking colours
Negligible input lag allows for enjoyable gaming response
Virtually no image retention
Integrated Freesat tuner
Wide viewing angle with no drop-off in contrast/ colour up to 150° (but can exhibit the odd “double image”; see Cons)
Perfect screen uniformity
Consumes less power than previous 1080p plasmas
Cons
No white balance and gamma controls available in user menu
Non-existent film mode deinterlacing
Some picture resolution and detail loss with 576i to 576p conversion
Green primary oversaturated and bluish
Mild red push
Settings cannot be saved independently per input (though can be saved separately for each picture mode)
Multilayered plasma glass causes “ghost image” of specific material (e.g. white text on a black background) to be repeated behind the original image, which is noticeable from certain off-axis angles/ distances
Still consumes more power than similarly-specced LCD TVs.
在40X4000下
我以為原生對比高達4000:1的面板
高光的處理應能很好才是,結果還是不夠好
光大介紹的JVC TV
要有細節,亮度還是調低了,這在電漿上較不會有這情形
電漿還有液晶所無法比擬的立體感,但液晶有電漿無法表現的銳利
各有利弊,不然選擇CRT是最佳的.....

NEO PDP我還是很期待的
PS內線消息,台灣這好像是7/6發表才全面鋪貨,再請等一等
內文搜尋
X



























































































