• 6

GS430 vs LS430 安全氣囊『爆與不爆』11/24補充說明


lexus9 wrote:
2010-11-22...(恕刪)


為什麼好好一台車你要撞這麼多次

你人都沒事嗎.....!?
chiang:正經一點,那些亂七八糟的你跟你同事私下聊吧,如果太過頭你就準備提前放年假了
在這邊鞭Lexus鞭的用力的各位..去看看這篇報導吧..
最好是有哪位仁兄可以把原文全部翻譯成中文..我只有力節錄了..

http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2010/05/airbags_deployment.html

"I had an accident on May 8, 2010 in my 2007 Corolla LE. The driver door was crushed and the car declared totaled," Lauren, of Mount Verson, N.Y., told ConsumerAffairs.com. "My car had six airbags. Not one airbag deployed to protect me from the inside of the car."

上述的車主說她的車被嚴重撞擊..到需要報廢..可是車上的6個安全氣囊都沒爆..基本上她的疑問跟這位LS430的車主一樣..

"Airbag standards change in 1999
In 1999 the federal government changed its air bag standards because it said airbag deployment was sometimes causing significant injury and even death. Particularly at risk, the government found, were children and small adults. Also, occupants not wearing a seatbelt interacted with the airbag differently than those wearing restraints.

As a result, cars now have sensors that analyze different types of data during a crash and make a split second decision about whether to deploy the vehicle's airbags. Some sensors are located outside the car and react to an object striking the vehicle. Some are located inside the car and measure the size and weight of the occupants. "

上述是美國消費者雜誌的記者整理出來的

1999年以後..美國聯邦的安全氣囊標準改變了..因為安全氣囊爆開時引起了很多的嚴重傷害..甚至死亡案例..1999年以後..車輛現在有不同的感應器..會根據撞擊時收取的資料..來決定安全氣囊爆不爆..

Speed and damage not good indicators
"Because air bag sensors measure deceleration, vehicle speed and damage are not good indicators of whether or not an air bag should have deployed," NHTSA said on its website. "Occasionally, air bags can deploy due to the vehicle's undercarriage violently striking a low object protruding above the roadway surface. Despite the lack of visible front-end damage, high deceleration forces may occur in this type of crash, resulting in the deployment of the air bag."

速度以及受損害程度並不是好的指標
因為安全氣囊感應器同時測量減速, 車輛速度跟受損情況並不適合用來判斷安全氣囊是不是開爆開, 美國高速公路安全局如此表示,
感覺真糟糕....爆不爆還看心情
不過這篇應該很快就被護衛隊淹沒啦
THE POWER OF MONEY
小弟覺的是第一次撞擊後
車子沒有完全修復(例如:有些感測器沒裝?)

才造成後面2,3次的AIR BAG 不動作...
T、L牌果然很安全~

都怕氣球爆開彈傷人,乾脆為了保護乘客,設計成不爆,但又同時強調6氣囊,以使駕駛能在心理層面更安心的開車,我真的可以感到他們的用心~真的~就甘心耶~

cowboytwn wrote:
如果真是這樣,那車商目前先撇責應付的說詞就是說謊,那就更可惡了。


I think you don't have to judge it base on "someone's assumption" even accuse manufacturer as "liar", overreaction.
^^A 請多多指教~

cowboytwn wrote:
如果真是這樣,那車商...(恕刪)


小弟只是假設性的問題啦..

因為現在電腦車那麼複雜,不是把零件"裝回去" 就好!!
有些還有牽涉到車用電腦coding 參數的設定值,

技師如果對車輛軟硬體摸的不夠熟,就會發生這種東西裝好了,卻不能正常動作的現象..


車輛硬體維修不難,只要有維修手冊/零件及齊全的工具,大多可以完成
而車輛軟體的設定/偵錯,則才是真正考驗技師功力的地方..
Lexus 應好好地處理, 說明原因.
有錯就要改, 沒改好前, 車主的生命安全, 仍是很重要的.
目前我還是多看看其他的. 會比較好一點.

ps : 管大, 我這樣寫可以了吧 !!
樓主真是有我不入地獄 誰入地獄的精神啊

不過撞成這樣還叫撞擊點不準
那真搞不懂怎樣才會爆了
對照現在Toyota狂打的形象廣告
說什麼實驗團隊一年在實驗室裡做幾萬幾千次的測試
實在是一大諷刺

難道說 因為Toyota在實驗室裡測試做得多
氣囊怎樣該爆怎樣不爆 就是他們說了算嗎
應該是以駕駛者認為他要爆而未爆才是算吧

支持樓主 給你加油!
  • 6
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?