• 20

台美規不同? 凌志轎車暴衝 消保官:業者疑隱瞞瑕疵真相

blhsing wrote:
並不是。文中所列的是...(恕刪)

大大...我錯了!不是有兩種處理方式。是召回車子中,有些再被點名的車款,有加強額外設計。

Toyota Announces Details of Remedy to Address Potential Accelerator Pedal Entrapment
The models involved are: 2007 to 2010 MY (model year) Camry, 2005 to 2010 MY Avalon, 2004 to 2009 MY Prius, 2005 to 2010 MY Tacoma, 2007 to 2010 MY Tundra, 2007 to 2010 MY ES350, 2006 to 2010 MY IS250, and 2006 to 2010 MY IS 350.
The specific measures of the vehicle-based remedy are as follows:

1. The shape of the accelerator pedal will be reconfigured to address the risk of floor
mat entrapment, even when an older-design all-weather floor mat or other inappropriate floor mat is improperly attached, or is placed on top of another floor mat. For the ES350, Camry, and Avalon models involved, the shape of the floor surface underneath will also be reconfigured to increase the space between the accelerator pedal and the floor.

2. Vehicles with any genuine Toyota or Lexus accessory all-weather floor mat will be provided with newly-designed replacement driver- and front passenger-side all- weather floor mats.

In addition, as a separate measure independent of the vehicle-based remedy,
Toyota will install a brake override system onto the involved Camry, Avalon, and Lexus ES 350, IS350 and IS 250 models as an extra measure of confidence. This system cuts engine power in case of simultaneous application of both the accelerator and brake pedals.

....................
...................
.................
文章出處:http://www.lexus.com/recall/pdf/Pedal_Entrapment_Recall_Press_Release.pdf

重複!!自刪
15151515151515
12億美金不是小數目

合理推論....若非心裡有鬼,豐田為何要認賠和解?

昨日的浪子~柯林髮落, 今日的巨星~球德洛, 明日的傳奇~褲濕啦 , 永遠的女神~愛田由
說駕駛是三寶的要不要先看一下新聞

駕駛在市區沿路踩了兩公里的煞車, 能閃過一路上的車, 最後去撞路邊一堆機車和廂型車停下來, 如果這叫做三寶, 那01板上的果真都神人輩出

oliver037361 wrote:
挖哩咧,誤踩 還可以噴快兩公里,乾脆說這不是尋常的三寶.....還是單隻中風吧


名車爆衝

車商林奐成:「車輛品質上是沒有相干的,合理懷疑說應該是,駕駛人操作,或者是有其他的狀況造成的。」
這說法被警方反駁
北市交通大隊副大隊長林基田:「整個沿路過程調出來看,她的尾燈煞車燈還有第三煞車燈,她都是維持有亮的(有踩剎車)。」
台灣的toyota經過台灣廠商特別設計過的
豈可拿國外兩光設計師做的版本來比擬
在台灣的豐田車是拿來開不是拿來撞的
有問題的一定都是使用者自己的問題~跟車子本身絕對不會有問題
因為是神車!!!
甚至今年三月十九號,美國司法部調查,豐田汽車才承認,是因為車子的油門控制出了問題,和解金高達十二億元美金。


有沒有這條新聞的連結呢???

orangebear1006 wrote:
甚至今年三月十九號,...(恕刪)

其實早些日子01有人貼出美國有人找出暴衝車子的程式設計有瑕庛網頁
只是全部都英文沒辦法引起太多共鳴吧
blhsing wrote:
CTS油門的內部結構...CTS油門的內部結構的設計的確完全不一樣。請讀此分析報導:
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2010/02/why-toyota-must-replace-flawed-cts-gas-pedal-with-superior-denso-pedal/
Lexus以及其它地區的Toyota使用的是Denso所生產的油門,設計不同,所以沒有相同的問題。(恕刪)

大大...你連結的文章我認真看了,第二段說明可以解釋一下嗎??是以年份區分、還是地區??
Before we briefly review the key design differences, we must acknowledge that Toyota is ultimately responsible for both designs. CTS has stated that its product was built to Toyota specifications. What we don’t know (or understand) is why Toyota has two such fundamentally different units in production. Is one unit cheaper to build? Or was CTS tooled up to produce its unit because of other similar units it builds for other manufacturers? What we do know is that the CTS unit has been used in Toyota products since 2005, whereas the Denso unit has been in use since well before that time. Toyotas sold in Europe are also subject to a similar recall, and based on the description of the issues and the unit, it appears that it is the same or similar design as the CTS unit, but we do not know if it was built by CTS or another supplier.
那台es350。是日本產的。跟美國多起es係列爆衝事件 都是一樣日本產的。

爆衝是事實。 重點是之後改款就沒再發生過了。

然而爆衝這種事車商也必須負責才是。沒有100%招回補救缺失。這也是個重點。
orangebear1006 wrote:
甚至今年三月十九號,美國司法部調查,豐田汽車才承認,是因為車子的油門控制出了問題,和解金高達十二億元美金。


有沒有這條新聞的連結呢???...(恕刪)
  • 20
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 20)
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?