web101tw wrote:
證據顯示VOLVO...(恕刪)
我來就不是來宣傳volvo有甚麼好
對volvo的回應都是網友要提只好回答
請回歸正題吧：
Lexus沒有引進 "自動煞停" 卻誤導大眾汽車安全的觀念
Lexus說 "駕駛人才是避免行車風險的最重要防線。所以，Lexus Safety System+的PCS強調的是在關鍵時刻提醒駕駛人，並預先加強煞車力道，以協助駕駛人在重要關頭將發生撞擊的可能性降到最低。"
個人認為 "自動煞停" 比加強煞車力道的系統還要多一分保障
Lexus不應該教育大眾 "人為煞車" 才是最重要的
而忽視自動煞停系統的價值
有關 "自動煞車" 比 "警示系統" 重要的證據請參考
Predicted availability of safety features on registered vehicles
Initial evaluations of forward collision warning systems estimated reductions in bodily injury liability claim frequencies of 4–9 percent. Benefits were even greater for those systems that added autonomous braking. Systems that provided autonomous braking reduced bodily injury liability claim frequency by 14–32 percent.
有關volvo的比較請移駕以下討論：
lexus還是volvo
