Volvo 桃園非原廠保養廠

celestar wrote:
開了三萬多公里後,後剎車來令片需更換

celestar wrote:
我的v60在開了三萬...(恕刪)

4399218 wrote:


Sorry to write back in English. No, it is the rear brake pad. I am surprised. This is my first car that has rear wears out faster than front. My friends told me his Passat is also the same! Actually on the ratio of 2:1 two time rear vs one time front. I really dont know the logic but according to Volvo, they have a heavier biasis on the rear brake, God knows!

應該是前煞車來令要換...(恕刪)

celestar wrote:
...(恕刪)

Yaoger wrote:
別家的不清楚，現在的...(恕刪)