midoyes wrote:
真的懂不懂，假懂裝懂，真的不重要，好不好這棟樓已經很多人說了！(恕刪)
Subaru的車好不好, 我只開過一台而已, 不想下評論
但是你拿IQS來說Subaru的車妥善率被Ford甩的老遠, 很不認同
懂不懂不是由你來定義的, 底下是JD power本身對IQS和VDS的解釋
中文翻譯很多本文的網友都已經濃縮解試過了
總歸一句, IQS非完全代表這棟樓討論的妥善率, 僅部分關連
而真正代表妥善率的2014 VDS調查, Subaru在業界標準"以上", Ford在業界標準"以下"
These are acronyms for J.D. Power and Associates five key automotive studies that provide the data for this site:
J.D. Power and Associates Initial Quality Study(IQS) - provides manufacturers and consumers with information on quality after 90 days of new-vehicle ownership. The study examines 217 vehicle attributes, and reports on a broad range of problems reported by owners. IQS has been an industry benchmark since 1987. In 2006, the study was redesigned to divide consumer-reported problems into two main categories: defect/malfunctions and design issues. Defect/malfunctions include a complete breakdown or malfunction of any component, feature, or item. Design problems include components or features that may be functioning as designed, but are perceived as difficult to use or understand, or in a poor location. Results from both categories are further divided into eight sub-categories?including the driving experience, the engine/transmission, exterior, and interior?to provide even more detail.
Vehicle Dependability Study (VDS) - measures long-term quality after three years of ownership. Therefore, the 2005 VDS measures the dependability of 2002 model-year vehicles. For consumers, the study provides insight into the reliability and dependability of brands and models as they approach the end of a typical warranty period. For manufacturers, the study is used to track the long-term quality of various models over time and to guide next-generation product development.
