• 5

Consumer Report年度報告出爐 - Subaru ranks No.2

ZestJDM wrote:
那件事鬧得挺大 不過實在好笑 它連接油門那根竟然是塑膠做的

估計那油門踏並不是完全塑料做的。

老美當事人和網友﹐們的相關討論很專業請
看下列的討論

steinvb12 (網友)
Cars with properly functioning breakaway pedals tend to score better in NCAP test than without. When you are talking about passenger compartment intrusion, which includes the front of the car or engine pushing against the firewall and in this case into the footwell area, there is a critical amount of crush intrusion that occurs before a foot or ankle breaks. If within that critical distance it is instead the brake or gas pedal that breaks, then the foot or ankle stands a better chance of avoiding injury.


Hiboost (當事人)
I know I shouldn't press harder than getting the throttle to 100%.

I think the main trouble began when I upgraded my clutch so I'm naturally pressing harder with my left foot and it's only natural to press with a similar force on your right foot when you aren't actively thinking about it. Couple this with trying to do lightning fast shifts without stripping the gears and launching perfectly on a clutch you've only launched on twice, there is quite a bit to keep you occupied when drag racing in a new setup. I may try some no lift shifting next time I'm on the street and see how many rpm's it raises between shifts. If I can keep it to only a few hundred then that may be my best bet.

Just got done moving my reinforced bracket onto the new part, and fitted a rubber stopper on the back of the pedal to share the load as well. I'll post some pictures of the final product soon.

neko_shi wrote:
不要小看樹!! 尤其是已經有點年歲的大樹~

樹根越密的樹底盤越堅固,撞到時的反作用力會完全回到車子上....
以前當兵時營裡就有悍馬跑去撞樹,車頭全毀(悍馬夠堅固了吧!!雖然引擎蓋是FRP,但鋼樑可不是普通的粗)
結果那顆樹除了破了點皮,掉了點樹葉外完全沒事

嗯有道理~
Pachilla wrote:
如果樹幹是從A柱跟B柱 (或者B跟C柱) 之間撞入的﹐也就是從車門那裡想刀子一樣切入﹐那裡是任何汽車結構最脆弱的地方。

大概只有沒有門的車(譬如說坦克車) 才可能提供足夠的保護吧。

從舊回憶想起來﹐該 WRX 應該是頭部正中撞上那大樹的~
kmj3943 wrote:
估計那油門踏並不是完全塑料做的。...(恕刪)


抱歉,英文不是挺好的,不過您提到的那段原文,不知那一段有提到"油門踏並不是完全塑料做"?
老福、小福、胖福、哈巴福、XV都在 My Subaru http://my-subaru.com
Found a more detailed report card on comsumer report's rating.



Japanese automakers all did well except Suzuki. (behind Ford)
Also
Chrysler is only maker that have ZERO % recommanded car <--- You can't get any worse than that. LOL
th21711072 wrote:
Found a mo...(恕刪)


好樣的 Subaru,不僅排名第二,連受測車輛也是唯一 100% 被推薦,這大概是車種少的好處,專注於可靠、安全的開發...
老福、小福、胖福、哈巴福、XV都在 My Subaru http://my-subaru.com
th21711072 wrote:
Found a mo...(恕刪)


volvo 的 xc70
可靠度不佳
好像在表中特別被提出來
不知是哪個部分的毛病?
Volvo XC70, overall new car prediction = worse than average





Trouble spot: major problem (solid dark circle) in body integrity
liyijo wrote:
volvo 的 xc70
可靠度不佳
好像在表中特別被提出來
不知是哪個部分的毛病?

連 VOLVO XC70 這樣的型號也被評為 "可靠度不佳"
這證明這 so called "Consumer Report" 可信度很低

看來很多的報告都是﹐

1﹑其報告職員專業和道德水平不高
2﹑造假出來給大家看爽罷了
3﹑有給了錢就有好話可以說
4﹑廠商高度合作就給予好評

這年頭連整個所謂的 "代表人民政黨" 都會製造很多奧步和造假事件來害人
這世界上還有什麼不會發生

kmj3943 wrote:
連 VOLVO XC70 這樣的型號也被評為 "可靠度不佳"
這證明這 so called "Consumer Report" 可信度很低

這2句話有邏輯可言? lol..
你有什麼可以証明XC 70的reliability很好?
Car #1: 2011 Hyundai Sonata 2.0T Limited Car #2: 2012 Ford Edge SEL + 205A
  • 5
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?