• 12

森林人,為何賣不好?

後勤體係讓人為之卻步,近期也是小弟換車選擇之一,礙於保養廠太遠及朋友口碑不佳,只好作罷,個人經驗。
我以前常開我哥的1997 impreza, 車子很可靠, 沒毛病,
現在還是頭好壯壯,

我上一台1996 k8...這幾年一直修...
兩台車差一歲而已妥善率差很多

之前我RAV4跟森林人在選時
他卻叫我不要買Subaru

唉...有趣
People respond to incentives.

Wallice_Chan wrote:
他的後勤維修根本是處...(恕刪)


正解

197350D wrote:
我真的搞不懂為何賣不...(恕刪)


維修養護據點太少~
現在的豐田汽車已經是SUBARU汽車的大股東了,

沒必要在這版上酸豐田的RAV4吧;不管誰大賣,

豐田都賺錢啊~
據聞是車型問題,2.0i入門跟XT頂級都賣到缺車,一堆訂單等著消化,反而是2.0i頂級跟XT入門車還很多,馬上可以交車領牌

如果樓主是用掛牌數來看的話,可能會有點不準喔!

A79002529 wrote:
現在的豐田汽車已經是...(恕刪)





"目前豐田汽車公司控有富士重工業16.5%的股份,因此和富士汽車有部分合作關係。"

http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%80%9F%E9%9C%B8%E9%99%B8%E6%B1%BD%E8%BB%8A

"Fuji Heavy Industries, the parent company of Subaru, is currently in a partial partnership with Toyota Motor Corporation, which owns 16.5% of FHI."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subaru




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuji_Heavy_Industries

"From 1968 until 1999, FHI was 20% owned by Nissan, who acquired the stake in 1968 during a period of government-ordered merging of Japanese auto industry firms in order to improve competitiveness against foreign companies under the administration of Prime Minister Eisaku Satō. During their ownership, Nissan was primarily interested in its bus manufacturing division and lent automaking expertise to Subaru. Upon Nissan's acquisition by Renault, its 20% stake was sold to General Motors, but General Motors announced on October 6, 2005 that it would sell 8.4% of the company to Toyota and dispose of its remaining share.[3]"

"On April 10, 2008, Toyota increased its stake in FHI to 16.7% and announced the end of FHI minicar production at its facility in Gunma Prefecture. Daihatsu, a subsidiary of Toyota, would instead supply the cars to FHI.[4]"
據我所知, 賣不好的原因是, Subaru只有一間工廠在做森林人, 全世界大賣的結果就是加班加不完, 車子做不出來.




所以賣不好.
輸在後續維修保養吧!! 這也會是我買車考量之一
  • 12
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 12)
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?