臭氧能抑制武漢肺炎?個人英文很差內復原文新聞 懇求解釋

最近看到一篇學術性報導
不廢話直接給網址:
https://www.thailandmedical.news/news/ozone-can-be-used-to-destroy-the-new-coronavirus-and-disinfect-areas
個人英文極奇的爛,給谷歌大神翻譯後類似外星文,但是為確保真實性所以上來請教
然後我實際到公共場所找找看有沒有裝臭氧機的結果發現!
臭氧能抑制武漢肺炎?個人英文很差內復原文新聞 懇求解釋
怎麼幾乎都是在廁所?所以是真能殺菌還是不能呀?
2020-02-24 16:18 發佈
可愛巧虎島佩佩珠 wrote:
最近看到一篇學術性報...(恕刪)

紅色部分是重點 就是在密閉空間
開放空間 大概作用不大
我到各過各大醫院 急診或門診 或醫院的廁所
沒有看到有裝過一台!
---------------------------
空氣應用濃度

◎作為空氣除味與殺菌,要求臭氧濃度較低,如0.25 ppm(0.5 mg/m³),而物品表面消毒(殺滅微生物和去除化學污染)則要求提高几十倍的臭氧濃度。

◎空氣應用臭氧濃度在1 mg/m³~10 mg/m³之間。

◎溫度低,濕度大則殺滅效果好,尤其是濕度,相對濕度小於45%,臭氧對空氣中懸浮微生物幾乎沒有殺滅作用。在60%時才逐漸增強,在95%時達到最大值。

◎用臭氧消毒食品加工車間,0.5~1.0 ppm即可殺滅空氣中的80%的自然菌。

◎冷庫消毒要求臭氧濃度6~10 ppm,停機後封庫24小時以上細菌殺滅率90%左右,黴菌殺滅率80%左右。

◎在水果貯藏期間,可用2~3 ppm的臭氧可使黴菌的生長受到抑制,貯藏期可延長一倍


水中應用濃度

◎水應用中臭氧溶解度在0.1 mg/L~10 mg/L之間。低值作為水消毒凈化要求的最低濃度,高值作為「臭氧水消毒劑」 可達到的濃度值。

◎自來水臭氧凈化,國際常規標準為0.4 mg/L的溶解度值,保持4分鐘,即CT值為1.6。

◎水中余臭氧濃度保持在0.1~0.5 mg/L作用5~10 min可達消毒目的。

◎臭氧水消毒滅菌是急速的,消毒作用在瞬間發生。清水中臭氧濃度一旦達到,在0.5~1分鐘內就殺死細菌,在濃度達4mg/L,在1分鐘內B肝病毒滅活率為100%。

◎Herbold報導:20℃條件下,水中臭氧濃度達0.43mg/L時,可將大腸桿菌100%殺滅,10℃時僅需0.36 mg/L即可全部殺滅。

◎臭氧濃度為0.25~38mg/L時,僅需幾秒或幾分鐘完全滅活A型肝炎病毒(HAV)。

◎礦泉水中臭氧溶解度在0.4~0.5mg/L時,即可滿足殺菌保質要求。合理的臭氧投放量為3~5mg/L。

◎瓶裝水處理應達0.3~0.5mg/L的臭氧溶解度值,要求投加臭氧應滿足 1m³水3g O₃的發生量。根據實踐經驗,臭氧發生濃度高於8mg/L時容易達到濃度。

。臭氧是一種強氧化劑,它在水中的氧化還原電位為2.07 eV,僅次於氟(2.5eV),其氧化能力高於氯(1.36eV)和二氧化氯(1.5eV),能破壞分解細菌的細胞壁,很快地擴散透進細胞內,氧化分解細菌內部氧化葡萄糖所必須的葡萄糖氧化酶等,也可以直接與細菌、病毒發生作用,破壞細胞、核糖核酸(RNA),分解脫氧核糖核酸(DNA)、RNA、蛋白質、脂質類和多糖等大分子聚合物,使細菌的代謝和繁殖過程遭到破壞。細菌被臭氧殺死是由細胞膜的斷裂所致,這一過程被稱為細胞消散,是由於細胞質在水中被粉碎引起的,在消散的條件下細胞不可能再生。應當指出,與次氯酸類消毒劑不同,臭氧的殺菌能力不受PH值變化和氨的影響,其殺菌能力比氯大600-3000倍,它的滅菌、消毒作用幾乎是瞬時發生的,在水中臭氧濃度0.3 - 2 mg/L時,0.5 - 1min內就可以致死細菌。達到相同滅菌效果(如使大腸桿菌殺滅率達99%)所需臭氧水藥劑量僅是氯的0.0048%。

臭氧對酵母和寄生生物等也有活性,例如可以用它去除以下類型的微生物和病毒

①病毒 已經證明臭氧對病毒具有非常強的殺滅性,例如Poloi病毒在臭氧濃度為0.05 - 0.45 mg/L時,2 min就會失去活性。

②孢囊 在臭氧濃度為0.3 mg/L下作用2.4 min就被完全除掉。

③孢子 由於孢衣的保護,它比生長態菌的抗臭氧能力高出10 - 15倍。

④真菌 白色念珠菌(candida albicans)和青黴屬菌(penicillium)能被殺滅。

⑤寄生生物(如蟎蟲)在3 min後被殺滅。

⑥可以迅速殺滅空氣中的大腸桿菌,金葡萄球菌,白色念珠菌等病菌。

⑦可以分解空氣中的臭味,煙味,濃香水味。


原文網址:https://kknews.cc/home/9lvjmv5.html
可愛巧虎島佩佩珠 wrote:
最近看到一篇學術性報(恕刪)

同樣我也好奇!求解答
看到這篇報導
https://star.ettoday.net/news/1643917
不知有沒專業的能稍微解說一下!如果有那麼一點點效用,也想要弄一個
soziwow wrote:
紅色部分是重點 就是(恕刪)

分享一下資訊
MERS and SARS: disinfection/sterilization of the environment

The recent findings that the SARS virus has the capacity to remain infectious on fomites for up to several days indicates that it is a hardier organism than most of its other lipid enveloped colleagues.

Predictably, disinfectants such as bleach, phenol, and formaldehyde have been found to be effective in deactivating the SARS virus; detergents, however, were less capable. Caustic liquid agents have the disadvantage of faring poorly in decontaminating complex medical equipment and the hospital room milieu of Coronavirus patients.

Ozone, in light of its pan-virucidal profile, offers the advantage of existing as a gas, with its attendant ability to disinfect poorly accessible spaces. Moreover, ozone has the distinct benefit of reverting to oxygen, while liquid–based disinfectants are likely to injure the surfaces to which they are applied, and to leave toxic residues. Ozone-mediated environmental decontamination, however, needs to respect stringent protocols to insure that the ambient ozone in the process of sterilizing the target environment has time to revert to its stable parent, oxygen, without inflicting toxicity to the personnel.

Summary and conclusions

SARS and MERS are acute pan-inflammatory multi-system syndromes caused by hitherto unknown coronavirus species. These virions incorporate novel RNA genomes and lipid bilayered glycoprotein envelopes. The SARS and MERS viruses, based upon what is known about Coronaviridae, possess high rates of mutation allowing any one infected individual to harbor numerous quasispecies.

Ozone is a naturally occurring energy-rich molecule embodying unique physico-chemical and biological properties suggesting a possible role in the therapy of MERS and SARS, either as a monotherapy or, more realistically, as an adjunct to standard treatment regimens.

This paper outlines six possible mechanisms by which ozone may exert its antiviral actions. Due to the excess energy inherent in the ozone molecule, it is theoretically plausible that ozone, unlike microbial-specific options, will show effectiveness across the entire Coronavirus spectrum. The acute infection phase of MERS and SARS is marked by massive viral replication, with viral flooding of the lymph and blood compartments. This stage presents the most clinical challenge. This paper proposes a method of viral culling via systemically administered oxygen/ozone gas to blood interfacing.

Ozone has unique disinfectant properties. As a gas, it has a penetration capacity that liquids do not possess. In view of the fact that MERS and SARS persist on fomites for up to several days, it is suggested that ozone technology be applied to the decontamination of medical environments.

In conclusion, a proposal is made that oxygen/ozone systemic therapy - demonstrated to be innocuous to humans and animals - be granted research consideration for MERS and SARS. Such therapeutic approach may then be found useful not only in these specific conditions, but also in future Coronavirus epidemics that are certain to emerge.

摘自http://www.triroc.com/sunnen/topics/sars.html
作者:http://www.triroc.com/sunnen/

大意就是這位博士認為臭氧比起一般漂白水以及酒精等殺滅冠狀病毒來得好!主要因為是氣體 容易能在空氣中施作,而其具有氧化還原特質,故不會有殘留,只是這個有年份了,不知道有沒後續文獻,在此補充
鳥屎哥 wrote:
分享一下資訊MERS...(恕刪)

感謝大大的分享,
如果最需要無菌的手術室內有裝的話,就是最佳的證明。 關於這一點有機會碰到醫生我會問一下。

剛剛看了一下其他國外的文獻, 確實你提到的用臭氧來殺菌的好處。
soziwow wrote:
感謝大大的分享,如果(恕刪)

Ozone’s remarkable capacities for pan-antipathogenic action have been applied to the treatment of poorly healing wounds and burns (Sunnen 1999). A partial list of organisms susceptible to ozone inactivation in these clinical situations includes aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, Bacteroids, Campylobacter, Clostridium, Corynebacteria, Escherichia, Klebsiella, Legionella, Mycobacteria, Propriobacteria, Pseudomonas, Salmonella, Shigella, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Yersinia. Susceptible viruses include Adenoviridae, Filiviridae, Hepnaviridae, Herpesviridae, Orthomyxoviridae, Picornaviridae, Reoviridae, and Retroviridae. Ozone-sensitive fungi include Actinomycoses, Aspergillus, Candida, Cryptococcus, Epidermophyton, Histoplasma, Microsporum, and Trichophyton.

好像能非常有效的對抗這些....
我也是查找一下互相分享,另外你說的這個我有看到一篇 TVBS報導,其說明因醫生手術造成的微粒,會有職災風險,長期配戴口罩又會影響情緒,好像都是用整合的醫療級機器
1.蜂巢式活性碳濾網功效
2.HEPA醫用級濾網
3.紫外線
4.臭氧氣體
5.光觸媒奈米銀濾網
感覺就貴桑桑,我也在思考只要能抑制冠狀病毒就OK了!想說畢竟各人工作性質,怕一不小心需要在家隔離,倘若能使用就能減少部分風險
哀怎麼都沒有一篇是確定告訴人是確實有效的
鳥屎哥 wrote:
我也在思考只要能抑制冠狀病毒..(恕刪)

還是要常洗手+戴口罩!

感謝大大分享!

剛剛又看了一些國外的文章
大意是說
手術室內的器具百百種
由簡單的滅菌棉棒, 注射器,牙醫的器具,手術刀,到貴重的醫療儀器(CT scan,CAT Scan) 等都有廠商規定的滅菌程序方法。個人相信臭氧雖有殺菌功能但非萬能殺菌, 如現在牙醫還是以高溫高壓蒸氣滅菌法(Autoclave)為主。有些不能以高溫高壓蒸氣滅菌的儀器,加上醫院裡病菌百百種,當然不會說用臭氧就可消毒。


下面是2003 的, 但現在是2020,應該有更進步的殺菌方法。
紅色部分是重點。
-----------------------------------------------------
WHO Surgical Care at the District Hospital 2003 CLEANING, DISINFECTION, STERILIZATION:

Sterilization The methods of sterilization in common use are:
1. Autoclaving・ Autoclaving should be the main form of sterilization at the district hospital.・ Before sterilizing medical items, they must first be disinfected and vigorously cleaned to remove all organic material. Proper disinfection decreases the risk for the person who will be cleaning the instruments.・ Sterilization of all surgical instruments and supplies is crucial in preventing HIV transmission. All viruses,including HIV, are inactivated by steam sterilization(autoclaving) for 20 minutes at 121°C?132°C or for 30 minutes if the instruments are in wrapped packs.・Appropriate indicators must be used each time to show that sterilization has been accomplished. At the end of the procedure, the outsides of the packs of instruments should not have wet spots, which may indicate that sterilization has not occurred.

2. Dry heat・ If items cannot be autoclaved, they can be sterilized by dry heat for1?2 hours at 170°C. Instruments must be clean and free of grease or oil.・ Sterilizing by hot air is a poor alternative to autoclaving since it is suitable only for metal instruments and a few natural suture materials.・ Boiling instruments is now regarded as an unreliable means of sterilization and is not recommended as a routine in hospital practice.

3. Antiseptics・ Sharp instruments, other delicate equipment and certain catheters and tubes can be sterilized by exposure to formaldehyde (福爾馬林,正規化學名叫甲醛) , glutaral 戊二醛 (glutaraldehyde) or chlorhexidine氯己定.・If you are using formaldehyde, carefully clean the equipment and then expose it to vapour from paraformaldehyde 多聚甲醛 tablets in a closed container for 48 hours.・Glutaral is a disinfectant that is extremely effective against bacteria, fungi and a wide range of viruses. Always follow the manufacturer’s instructions for use.
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?