他今早去拿車 到中午小弟下班回家打電話問問他試車如何 他說因為要陪女友 只試了車店至回家的一段路 (約22公里上下吧)
他給我的答覆是 平路比adv快了一點 平時38km巡航的一段直路 今日輕易42km走完 (他說都是無風的) 但
是...但是上斜還是tcr adv sl2(2012) 比較好的多....他的adv sl2 配c50 板輪 比porpel 的板輪還要重100g
但明顯感到重拖 因為平時我朋友都用家附近的斜路來練習腳力 平時可以20~23kms的 今天試車最高只能17~20kms
他說因為用的力要多了 我打算下星期日問他借車來試 到時跟大家出個詳細報告 謝謝
看來porpel 不能太兼顧斜路 (畢竟是空氣動力車) tcr還是有很大市場的
來源Bikeradar
What about the TCR Advanced SL?
If the new Propel Advanced SL supposedly offers similar stiffness, ride quality, and weight characteristics to the current TCR Advanced SL flagship as Giant claims, it begs the question of where that model stands in relation to the new aero bike – and if it's even still relevant.
As it turns out, "similar" is not the same as "equal" and Giant says the TCR Advanced SL still outperforms the Propel in terms of non-aero performance – but not by much. Riders who prioritize stiffness, ride quality and light weight will probably still want to go with the more structurally efficient TCR, but they should keep in mind that the aerodynamic gap grows even further with that bike's more rectangular tube profiles.
victorng2318 wrote:
他今早去拿車 到中午...(恕刪)
我的部落格~iwenhc.blogspot.com
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X