aquaeuro wrote:很多人覺得後扭力樑懸吊=節省成本=國民車感謝A-class為大家破除這條迷思 眾多還在用後輪非獨立懸吊的歐洲國民掀背車也得到了救贖 除非Mercedes S/E Class也上了扭力樑懸吊,否則您的論點不成立!A class上了扭力樑不就是降成本嗎?真行的話為何A250還用多連桿?
collective wrote:除非Mercedes...(恕刪) 對於賓士而言可能真的為了擴大入門車型銷售市場而降低成本 拉低售價但對於某些人來說 A class 仍是賓士 仍是豪華車 而豪華車應該就是四輪獨立懸吊這是一個待突破的心理障礙
Obiwan-Kenobi wrote:日本車在力爭上游,歐洲車在向下沉淪....... 如果非獨立扭力樑後懸吊代表向下沉淪 那四代馬三也要算一份!torsion beam rear switch for 2019 mazda 3
Obiwan-Kenobi wrote:就都是偷料省錢的概念 就算是cost-down 車廠也不會承認 他們自有對應話術日本馬是這麼說的:...“We are focusing on the value for the customer, therefore we selected this kind of torsion beam axle instead of the multi-link suspension...from: https://www.goauto.com.au/news/mazda/mazda3/mazda-defends-small-car-suspension-rethink/2017-09-10/65426.html