因為我怕被打…………….
MSI 9600GSO寬頻版跟原廠剛出來時有所不同
當時NV 9600GSO出來是記憶體頻寬192bit 384M
現在MSI把記憶體頻寬變大,現在是256bit 512M DDR3
這樣依來他就跟市場的96GSO有所不同,相對的效能會有所提高
MSI R4670這一版撘配的是記憶體1G DDR3的規格
一般市面上的都只有512M,而MSI再給他加碼上去
對於一般記憶體要大的人多了一個可以選擇
先看看包裝盒了
9600GOS包裝盒直接標示256位元寬頻版
![測試]MSI 9600GOS 256bit寬頻版 vs R4670 1G DDR3版](http://attach.mobile01.com/attach/200901/mobile01-e1970a73f7bb8c986aed34da1ce1b58e.jpg)
R4670 包裝盒標示搭贈魔獸世界(很熱門的遊戲)
![測試]MSI 9600GOS 256bit寬頻版 vs R4670 1G DDR3版](http://attach.mobile01.com/attach/200901/mobile01-da9885e46aa7f01b981afc05dd3f8ef2.jpg)
還送99點新手包
9600GOS 本尊
![測試]MSI 9600GOS 256bit寬頻版 vs R4670 1G DDR3版](http://attach.mobile01.com/attach/200901/mobile01-13d743ea320563ba35fa3db7d5782eff.jpg)
MSI搭配的是韓國拉麵全銅風扇,誠意很夠歐~ 爽度出來了
有的廠商只用半銅的…..
記憶體是用奇夢達-14的顆粒
![測試]MSI 9600GOS 256bit寬頻版 vs R4670 1G DDR3版](http://attach.mobile01.com/attach/200901/mobile01-2ab4a26e6745085749e39b4c7e502b42.jpg)
R4670 本尊
![測試]MSI 9600GOS 256bit寬頻版 vs R4670 1G DDR3版](http://attach.mobile01.com/attach/200901/mobile01-4a1a5601cbe7c139e37732cbfbbc62b4.jpg)
PCB比96GSO短小了許多,R4670不外加電源
風扇是放射狀的
記憶體三星-11的,不錯這爽度夠
![測試]MSI 9600GOS 256bit寬頻版 vs R4670 1G DDR3版](http://attach.mobile01.com/attach/200901/mobile01-01dc23b4c98a46e6ad56aed4f6e15dd1.jpg)
這兩款輸出介面 都是雙DVI
![測試]MSI 9600GOS 256bit寬頻版 vs R4670 1G DDR3版](http://attach.mobile01.com/attach/200901/mobile01-abc6eb12ec37130940e0e1cd62f681f6.jpg)
PCB大小比一比
![測試]MSI 9600GOS 256bit寬頻版 vs R4670 1G DDR3版](http://attach.mobile01.com/attach/200901/mobile01-753862d076caa3702249b05dc3bf162a.jpg)
差很多吧! 相差6公分
接下來是上機測試
![測試]MSI 9600GOS 256bit寬頻版 vs R4670 1G DDR3版](http://attach.mobile01.com/attach/200901/mobile01-854fb3eddf436a9159d924765fc6b26c.jpg)
測試平台 硬體
M/B MSI P45 Platiunm
CPU Q8200 2.3G OC 2.8G
RAM DDR2/800 1G*2
HDD 80G
VGA NV 9600GOS ,ATI R4670
測試軟體
OS XP SP2
VGA驅動版本 NV 180.70 , ATI 8.10
3D MARK 05,06 CRYSIS , FurMark 1.4
先稍待休息一下,晚點補測試圖檔……………….
機器還在跑…………………
別走開…………….要尿尿的可以先去
補測試文..............
先前忘了說明96GOS只安裝驅動PhyX驅動沒安裝
9600GSO
3D MARK 05 1024*768 16,403
![測試]MSI 9600GOS 256bit寬頻版 vs R4670 1G DDR3版](http://attach.mobile01.com/attach/200901/mobile01-f29d6f403bb8272148f1cc48daf63896.jpg)
4670
3D MARK 05 1024*768 14,996
![測試]MSI 9600GOS 256bit寬頻版 vs R4670 1G DDR3版](http://attach.mobile01.com/attach/200901/mobile01-f49a36b7615dd37e71f540cf729e3298.jpg)
9600GSO
3D MARK 06 1280*1024 10,125
![測試]MSI 9600GOS 256bit寬頻版 vs R4670 1G DDR3版](http://attach.mobile01.com/attach/200901/mobile01-4a427c66d6f46724989eb5ffa24b254f.jpg)
4670
3D MARK 05 1280*1024 8,160
![測試]MSI 9600GOS 256bit寬頻版 vs R4670 1G DDR3版](http://attach.mobile01.com/attach/200901/mobile01-ada230dd07e30ae79576332298a198a0.jpg)
FurMark 1.4
9600GSO
在執行中截取
1024*768 NOAA FPS平均 37
1280*1024 NOAA FPS平均 22
FurMark 1.4
4670
在執行中截取
1024*768 NOAA FPS平均 50
1280*1024 NOAA FPS平均 32
CRYSIS 末日之戰
9600GSO
Run #1- DX9 1024x768 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 38.38
Run #2- DX9 1024x768 AA=2x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 32.14
Run #3- DX9 1024x768 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 29.85
Run #4- DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 25.425
Run #5- DX9 1280x1024 AA=2x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 21.595
Run #6- DX9 1280x1024 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 19.955
4670
Run #1- DX9 1024x768 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 39.205
Run #2- DX9 1024x768 AA=2x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 27.87
Run #3- DX9 1024x768 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 26.42
Run #4- DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 26.665
Run #5- DX9 1280x1024 AA=2x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 18.495
Run #6- DX9 1280x1024 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 17.575
總結:
3D MARK表現上9600GOS表現比較強
FurMark 1.4 R4670終於贏了一次
CRYSIS 末日之戰 9600GOS 在1024*768與1280*1024 NOAA 小輸R4670
但開2AA 4AA 9600GOS卻又小贏 R4670
溫度表現
9600GSO搭配是拉麵風扇散熱效果不錯,在測試中最高只到58度表現不錯
R4670是搭配放射狀的鋁鰭散熱器,看起來不怎麼樣,但溫度表現卻很好
最高紀錄48度.....................50度都不到
以上是小弟的測試,提共給網友參考