游戏脑力 wrote:
上市後:
5800h vs 4800h
單核+15%,多核4%
以客觀公正聞名遐邇的geekbench說單核+22%多核+12%，geekbench居然比cinebench還叛變！我又要森七七囉。
啊什麽你説功耗不一樣怎不拿同樣瓦數出來比？甚麽3070。。。對不起我聼不到。
游戏脑力 wrote:
先別急 馬上奉上真相(恕刪)
up主原文:
Power部分
this is the power draw that was measured during the blender benchmark. so the 5800h was drawing more power while only completing the task around 2 percent faster. now this isn't perfectly comparable as this is total system power, and the laptops are different so things like screen difference will come into play. i saw a similar difference in power draw in cinebench r23 though.
（這是在blender基準測試期間測得的功耗。 5800h的功號更大，而完成任務的速度僅快2％。這不具備完全的可比性，因為這是系統總功率，而筆電不同，因此屏幕差異之類的事情也要計入。我在cinebench r23中看到了相似的功耗差異。）
45W部分
for the purposes of trying to do a fairer comparison, i've limited both processors to a 45w tdp for the next set of testing. these are the cinebench r23 scores from both laptops with the same power limit. so the 5800h is now just four percent faster. in multi-core score the 5800h is also drawing four watts more from the wall, but again this could be down to other differences between the laptops such as the screen.
what i found interesting was that my 4800h was able to reach higher clock speeds at the same 45w tdp. i'm guessing this sort of thing could come down to silicon lottery. of course assuming the way hardware info reads the sensor is measured the same between zen 2 and 3.
（為了進行更公平的比較，在下一組測試中，我將兩個處理器的tdp限制為45w。 這些是兩台功耗限制下的cinebench r23得分。 因此5800h現在僅快4％。 5800h在多核方面也多用了4瓦電量，但這可能再次歸因於筆記本電腦之間的其他差異，例如屏幕。
我發現有趣的是，我的4800h在同樣45W下能夠達到更高的時脈。 我想這種事情可能與矽片的體質有關。 當然同時要假設zen 2和3之間硬體信息傳感器在是以相同方式被讀取的。）
淡水小龍蝦，聼也聽不懂，睇也睇不明。
游戏脑力 wrote:
他只是在安慰a粉 而已
瞭解瞭解，當然是這樣。波蘭人自己不知道自己的測評在寫什麽，intel首席工程師不知道自己在搞IPC，現在這個up主不是說的那個意思，不是很正常嗎。
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X