別再幻想說什麼進化版本了
推土機不行還是不行....除非各家的測試報告也是筆誤
coldreflect wrote:
若效能一樣 砍電晶體數目可以降功耗吧!
這樣是好事情阿
只是..怎麼可以砍那麼多電晶體還可以達到同樣效能@@當初工程師設計很多不需要的東西沒去除嗎= =?
就是 AMD 原表示的 Bulldozer 電晶體數量是錯的, 實體結構沒變, 報導數字更正
"AMD has taken the unusual and embarrassing step of correcting its quoted transistor count for Bulldozer chips from two billion to just 1.2 billion."
""Last week, AMD confirmed the transistor count in the AMD FX CPU line-up at 1.2 billion, a correction from the earlier count of 2 billion. The earlier figure of 2 billion transistors was unfortunately shared in error."
"This correction is not the result of a new revision to the Bulldozer design."
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2130451/amd-lops-800-million-transistors-core-bulldozer-chips
不過連這種自家重要產品的電晶體數字都會引述錯誤是怎樣?
另外一個地方的計算是, 那個數字其實也不是 1.2 billion
"If two billion transistors seemed awfully fat, however, 1.2 billion is pretty darn thin...." "This means that CPU + cache alone would be 1.32B transistors, before we add I/O, integrated memory controller, or HyperTransport."
http://www.extremetech.com/computing/107929-amd-cuts-800m-transistors-off-bulldozer-confusion-ensues
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X