b122 wrote:
沒什麼好說i家安逸太(恕刪)
也不算走錯路~
畢竟Ryzen 算是拿農耕機的概念繼續演化出來的~
只能說當初技術成熟,把一切想的太美好~
然後又沒選用適當供應商...
錯誤的累積就是災難
游戏脑力 wrote:
10900t基礎頻率(恕刪)
你才愛嘴
規格表 10900T 1.9G 25W - 4.6G TDP 35W
工程師應該是以這範圍做設計 而不是跑 4.6G 時的 123W.
要我看表有啥意義? 直接拿電功率計來測.
==
有個 Moore's Law is dead 頻道 多看一下
https://www.youtube.com/c/MooresLawIsDead/videos
聽聽他們說 INTEL, 三星良率有多差?
==
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/e8bfxd/amd_has_935_chiplets_with_all_8_cores_and_full/
Because chiplets are small and TSMC defect density is low on average 93.5% of all Zen2 chiplets have 0 defects and AMD gets 749 fully functional 8-core chiplets from a single 300mm wafer - enough for 187 32-core Epyc CPUs.
By comparison Intel's 28-core Xeon is huge ( 32 x 29 mm ) so with the same defect rate Intel would have 46% defect-free dies - would only get 24 CPUs from a single 300mm wafer.
==
一小時九分處 : QUALOMM 嘗試採用三星 10 nm, 結果良率只有 5%!
1:33:45 : 三星提供 QUALCOMM, NVIDIA 比台積便宜 30% 的價格, 結果這二家仍然選擇台積!
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X