雖然不是每次都是電話或在小7叫車，但大多都是選擇最「大」的車行，印象中沒有這麼不好的經驗~
這位大大可以多分享這個案例的過程嗎~
tushiou01 wrote:
這都是機率問題。
我自己的經驗是55688或55178遇到鳥事的機率遠大於UBER，又比較貴。
最誇張的是有次叫計程車，說5分鐘後到，等了15分鐘沒到，打給計程車客服結果被嗆「不爽等不要叫車啊」，然後直接被掛電話。
Leonarka wrote:
但最大問題就是在台灣被法條跟計程車排擠
只有台灣的法條與Uber有衝突嗎?
只有台灣的計程車司機排擠Uber嗎?
在他的發源地美國也一樣,在許多州都與當地各種勞工法規,與職業駕駛法規有牴觸.
http://time.com/3924941/uber-california-labor-commission-ruling/
This week a ruling from the California Labor Commission was made public because popular ride-sourcing company Uber appealed it. A San Francisco-based driver named Barbara Ann Berwick brought a case alleging that she is an employee, not an independent contractor as Uber claims. It emerged that the commission ruled in her favor, saying the company owed her $4,152 in expenses. But this could lead to rulings worth much more.
Uber在許多國家都與現行職業駕駛管理規定有所牴觸.
在新加坡,Uber是被新加坡政府勒令關閉,不准營業.
https://coconuts.co/singapore/news/uber-cease-singapore-operations-may-7/
Savor this weekend, Singaporeans. This is your last weekend with Uber.
After five years, the U.S.-based ride-hailing app is set to cease all its operations in Singapore on Monday, May 7, completing the buy out made earlier this year by competitor Grab.
In a statement issued by Uber on Saturday, it says “The Uber app will cease to operate in Singapore after 7 May in accordance with directions from the Competition and Consumer Commission (CCCS) of Singapore.”
Uber was originally scheduled to stop its operations on April 15, but the termination was postponed due to a CCCS review of the Grab-Uber deal.
While the CCCS stands firm on Uber’s cessation in Singapore, the commission also admits that not all investigations will be completed by May 7.
內文搜尋