• 7

老虎伍茲洛杉磯翻車座駕--現代Genesis GV80 (出事時撞擊速度警方已經公布,在67樓)

老實說車室完整,人應該是要能自己走出來

實際
洛杉磯警方表示,須動用金屬鉗破壞車體,才能將老虎伍茲拖出車外。

雙腿複雜性骨折,代表車有一些問題
一堆人在洗白
https://www.flickr.com/photos/aquamojo/sets/
根據洛杉磯警局的講法, 如果老虎開的是別台車,應該早就喪命了!

Los Angeles County Sheriff Alex Villanueva said during a Tuesday evening press briefing, the outcome could have been far worse.
“The cabin of the vehicle was more or less intact, the front end was totally destroyed, the bumpers, everything was destroyed, airbags deployed all of that,” said Villanueva. “However, thankfully the interior was more or less intact, which kind of gave him the cushion to survive what otherwise would’ve been a fatal crash.”

這兩天美媒各家的報導, 大部分是讚美Genesis GV80的安全性:
https://nypost.com/2021/02/24/genesis-gv80s-safety-features-may-have-saved-tiger-woods-life/

https://www.foxbusiness.com/lifestyle/genesis-suv-tiger-woods-facts

https://carbuzz.com/news/tiger-woods-lucky-to-be-alive-in-genesis-gv80-crash

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2021/02/24/genesis-gv-80-tiger-woods-car-accident-suv-safety/4573081001/
Monte920 wrote:
根據洛杉磯警局的講法, 如果老虎開的是別台車,應該早就喪命了!


車時速多少?
都不知道就代表,一堆人在瞎掰安全

車室完整,人應該是要能自己走出來,而不是雙腿複雜性骨折
https://www.flickr.com/photos/aquamojo/sets/
thunderbird wrote:
都不知道就代表,一堆人在瞎掰安全


沒有人在瞎掰, 這是辦案的警察說的, 他也沒有必要幫現代車講話, 我只是引用他公開說的, 這些都登在各大美媒上面, 我是拿媒體的報導給你看. 請問你真的讀了嗎?

你不相信警察官方, 不相信媒體報導, 那
Monte920 wrote:
車時速多少?


時速200撞成這樣,我會說車好棒棒

連時速多少都不知道,就在吹捧車好棒棒

所以我也懶得這些吹捧文
https://www.flickr.com/photos/aquamojo/sets/
thunderbird wrote:
老實說車室完整,人應(恕刪)



看了CNN現場說明,這車翻滾了好遠的距離,撞倒好幾顆樹,這樣還要人自己走出來,看來台灣人對汽車安全的要求確實非常高

https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2021/02/24/tiger-woods-crash-path-scene-watt-ac360-vpx.cnn/video/playlists/tiger-woods-car-crash/
洛杉磯警方不打算對老虎的意外提告, 說明只是意外, 並說從一月以來該路段已經出現13次車禍.

至於老虎的撞法, 這裡有描述, 英文好的請自行閱讀:
While coming around a curve in the road, Woods' vehicle struck the median and then crossed over into oncoming traffic, Villanueva said. The SUV then hit the curb and began to roll over before eventually coming to a stop in an embankment about 30 yards away from the road.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tiger-woods-accident-no-charges-expected-in-crash/

希望讀完新聞稿後的人上來評論!
『BCA盲點偵測系統、FCA主動煞停輔助系統、RCTA後方車側警示系統、SCC智慧型主動車距維持系統、RCCA後方交通警示系統、ADAS智慧駕駛輔助系統、HDA II車道維持輔助系統…等當今高階車款的安全科技一應俱全。』

我比較好奇的是,為什麼主動安全配備這麼好的車,會在一般道路上失控翻車?
是不是該針對車子的操控性來討論?

被動安全到是值得肯定
abc123def wrote:
『BCA盲點偵測系統(恕刪)


車 人在開的..出事怪車..這有點奇怪..

我們這 好多車 樹都撞不倒 反而自己先夾死在車上....

不管車好不好 至少要比樹還硬吧
thunderbird wrote:
老實說車室完整,人應(恕刪)

真實的車駕駛座有方向機,腳踏板,
上半身有安全帶,下半身有?

當然若用鍵盤開車,就算連翻30圈也會手腳沒事
  • 7
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 7)
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?