ballcat wrote:
第一個影片 , 我怎...(恕刪)
影片的出處寫的英文是說手機
This is what happens when you pick up your cell phone while filling your car at a Gas Station - especially to those States that it is SELF SERVICE (Thank God for New Jersey).
這發生的事情是當你在加油時千萬不要拿你的手機出來接
幸好紐澤西州的加油站都全站有安全的滅火裝置按鈕(也有影片可以看,下次抓給你們看)
This video was taken at a gas station in Brazil. It may be Brazil, but it can Happen ANYWHERE AND TO ANYONE!!
這個影片是發生在巴西的加油站,也許是巴西,但是這可能發生在任何一個地方,任何一個人身上.
So, remember NOT to pick up your cell phone while Pumping You Gas, People!!!!
請記得,不要當你在加油時,拿出你的手機,大伙們~
P.S. - The guy who went to the top of the truck to pickup his cell phone, he died 3 days later.
註: 這個被火燒到的人,在三天後不幸過世.
煥仔LINE貼圖上架囉https://line.me/S/sticker/17182258
把主角放在手機跟加油站太可笑了
原PO應該仔細解釋火花與油氣的關係
再討論哪些情況會造成這兩個因素碰頭而容易使油氣燃燒
然後再"建議"哪些動作最好不要做
不過要扯到爆炸,那真的是...
連影片中那個,我只看到車子的問題..
沒看到插在車上的油槍爆炸阿?
"接手機"跟爆炸絕對沒有關係的
而是手機的電器部分有可能在某種狀況下產生靜電or火花才有"機率"使油氣燃燒
而不管手機產生靜電或火花的機率,或是這些靜電火花點燃油氣的機率都低到...
兩者相乘就更低了
手機是無辜的,否則,
那是不是在路上看到開某牌子的車常常違規,就認定開該牌子的人都會違規?
重點是人,對吧?
在加油站會產生靜電或火花的因素太多了
不是只有手機而已
當然,沒人有敢肯定告訴你在加油站使用手機不會爆炸
就像醫生也不敢跟你說接吻絕不會出人命是一樣的
有些事情,知道就好,沒有必要特別去避免,也沒有必要特別去做
當然啦,
下次看到有人在加油站裡面打電話
你可以趕快拔腿就跑
煥仔 wrote:
影片的出處寫的英文是...(恕刪)
Once again, you have just proved your idiotism.
Fisrtly, you don't need to translate the whole thing from YouTube. There are plenty of people who speaks, writes and reads english in this forum.
(If you wish to do so, you might as well translate those comments on that clip and see what other people have said about it)
Secondly, you are a grownup. You should have the ability to distinguish the right and wrong before you spread it around as a solid statement(FACT).
Otherwise, a question is acceptable.
Thirdly, your comebacks and arguments are FLAWED. No one ever challenged you on what you've read about the description along with the clip.
All we were trying to say is "Under normal circumstance, cell phone itself, it's not possbile to cause any fire or explosion at gas station which contradicts your original topic (Don't Use Cell Phone at Gas Station) of this post.
In addition, this matter had been proven false."
And then, you got all defensive and said "who said cell phone and electromagnetic wave causes the fire"
I won't bother explainning eveything all over again. Anyone who might be interested could read from page 1.
Then, my conclusion was if it was the spark that caused the fire/explosion but not Necessarily have to be CELL PHONES.
You should change your topic for a bit and stop spreading false news around.
煥仔 wrote:
道歉就不用了,我又不認識你..
You really thought that was a sincere apology? How Naive!!
煥仔 wrote:
既然每個人都是科學家
那就請你們來解釋跟順順文意好了
我想那段敘述的中文版可能不是你本人翻吧？
If you did translate it, read what I have wrote again.
Don't just read, Do read and think again with your eyes and brain respectively.
You'll find the answer you were meant to look for.
Words have been spoken.
Stick a fork in me, I am done.
No more reply on this thread.
By the way, only immature changes what he/she has wrote/post, then tries to have a comeback/argument out of it.
內文搜尋