今天蘋果日報報導富比士對汽車安全做評比,其中別克有一款(賣188萬的)安全最差,然後馬自達3,福特ESCAPE,豐田YARIS都在不安全榜上有名.
首先,我一直以為富比士是評一些名人或富豪排行榜的單位,沒想到也有評車子安全性.
當然被點名的幾家車廠,訪問國內該車廠集團高層不是顧左右而言他,不然就是以歐規美規台規測試結果會不同去回應,間接暗示富比士用美規去測試的報告結論不準(我承認我潛意識認為台規應該是最差的)
不過有一家車廠高層回覆的很妙,他說該測試不安全的是4門款,台灣國內賣的是5門掀背款,所以測試不準
問題來了,一款4門款不安全的車,在其他安全配備不變的情況下,5門掀背款就會變的很安全??????
是我太龜毛了還是對汽車的認知不夠?還是那位高層XXXXX
柯林髮落 wrote:
今天蘋果日報報導富比...(恕刪)
裡面大部分是針對駕駛的部份做安全評比.
沒有側氣囊的車大多都比較差.
個人也認為國產的會更糟.還有幾台被視為最危險車款.
在國外安全配備比國內更多.進口後很多設備被偷掉.危險耶.
atoss888 wrote:原文在這個網頁，有能耐的就自己親自讀一讀吧！
福特雙門掀背Ford...(恕刪)
http://www.forbes.com/vehicles/2006/10/30/safety-cars-airbags-forbeslife-vehicles-cx_dl_1031lsafe.html
精采的內容摘錄如下：
We were surprised that the list consisted entirely of small passenger cars, such as Ford Motor's Focus, and the Saturn Ion. We expected to see at least one SUV on the roster. But a section on the Highway Loss Data Institute's (HLDI) Web site explains why the list looks the way it does: small two- and four-door cars typically have higher death rates and higher-than-average insurance injury claims.
Automakers whose cars made the list took issue with it. The main complaints involved the IIHS' testing procedures, the meaning of a worse-than-average rate of injury-claim filings and the fairness of singling out cars with one or more bad scores despite multiple good scores in other areas.
所以...
1. 迷你級距的車種本來就沒多少本錢可以被撞。要買要有心理準備。
2. IIHS的評分方式其實也有一些爭議，要參考測試成績，要會看內容才有意義。
...Ford Motor's (nyse: F - news - people ) Focus four-door and Mazda's Mazda3 four-door, for which there are no IIHS crash-test ratings with side airbags;...
In terms of other comments we received, a Mazda spokesman wrote that the Mazda3 has a "good" IIHS frontal-impact rating, despite the "poor" side rating of models tested without side airbags. And, he said, "many Mazda3 models also feature dynamic stability control, traction control and anti-lock brakes, a combination of safety features not available on many other vehicles in its class."
We noted all vehicles with a "poor" score in frontal and/or rear crash testing. No current-model car has a "poor" frontal score, but the IIHS has issued 41 "poor" side ratings, of which 12 went to small cars. Of those 12 small cars, seven were tested without optional side bags, including General Motors' 2007 Chevrolet Cobalt four-door, Mazda's 2007 Mazda3 four-door and Toyota's 2007 Corolla four-door.
20. Mazda3
Four-Door/Five-Door Hatchback
SCORE: 113
Consumer Reports' accident avoidance: Much better than average
The Mazda3 has been the darling of automotive critics. The styling is unique and still stands out several years after introduction, the powertrain is peppy, and it's one of the best-handling small cars. Now for the bad part: Both the sedan and hatchback versions of the 3 fared very poorly in side-impact crash tests, garnering a lowly three-star rating from NHTSA and the lowest "Poor" rating from the IIHS. Side airbags aren't standard, either.
我想很明顯的，水果日報的記者素質令人質疑
台馬應該以該報導不完全、損及商譽，要求水果報追加平衡報導！
怎麼只含糊的說這是因為歐規美規的差別？！
明明就是因為富比士報導的主題是側面安全氣囊/簾的重要性，而所引述的Mazda3送至IIHS受測車型沒有配置側面氣囊/簾，導致側面撞擊測試分數低落。
而台灣所引進的，則是正面側面氣囊都齊全的車型，怎麼能夠拿來相比？
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X