小史能打季後賽嗎?

chipin723 wrote:
我是贊成小史一直投下去就行了
這160的局數一點根據也沒有...(恕刪)

chipin723 wrote:
這160的局數一點根據也沒有

劉肯尼 wrote:
那你就錯了, 這是多...(恕刪)

Shutting down Strasburg for the remainder of the season, as the Nationals plan on doing sometime within Stephen Strasburg might only pitch another 35 innings this season. (AP)the next month, is a decision based neither in science nor logic. It's a guess. That is all. The Nationals are guessing it is good to limit Strasburg's sewn-together elbow to somewhere in the 160- to 180-inning range in his first full season post-Tommy John surgery.

They are guessing because the hard, study-backed evidence to say whether that's actually the case does not exist, and because when it comes to the pitching arm, there is no such thing as logic

Catastrophic injuries tend to hit the 25-and-under population with greater frequency than their wizened counterparts. The 25-and-younger group represents 28.5 percent of the 592 pitchers who have thrown in the major leagues this season. Of the 29 Tommy John surgeries this year, 12 – or 41.4 percent – have been on pitchers between 21 and 25.

Pitch counts arrived in full force around the mid-1990s, and in less than a decade the tickers in every stadium grew into an ever-present watchdog on managers. Anger the pitch-count gods and the wrath of Tommy John will strike down on thee.

"And what have pitch counts done?" one trainer asked. "What is the reason you do pitch counts? To protect the pitcher's arm. The DL will tell you it has not protected the pitcher's arm."

His point: It's not science, not yet, not as long as a study or a hypothesis that has been replicated outside of a laboratory continues to elude those in charge of the game.

Of course young pitchers run a risk of getting injured. They're young pitchers. Their injury rate is already 50 percent. Correlation is not causation.

The Nationals are potentially jeopardizing their fantastic 2012 season to do something that they have absolutely no idea will protect his arm from further damage.

The closest thing to proof about the efficacy of innings limits is among teenagers. Studies have shown pitchers who throw more innings are likelier to blow out their elbow or shoulder. There is no specific number of innings. It's simply a caution to limit the workload on young arms – which, biomechanists admit, are entirely different beasts from strong, developed adult limbs.

m6578900 wrote:
今天報紙也有提到 有...(恕刪)

劉肯尼 wrote:
那你就錯了, 這是多...(恕刪)