小弟慢慢研究研究!
Thomas8610 wrote:
剛看文章看到的，分享...(恕刪)
gogopass wrote:
朋友，這裡可能有點誤...(恕刪)
搞錯哪?
你應該先搞清楚是什麼原因造成 EPOC
Excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC, informally called afterburn) is a measurably increased rate of oxygen intake following strenuous activity intended to erase the body's "oxygen deficit." In historical context the term "oxygen debt" was popularized to explain or perhaps attempt to quantify anaerobic energy expenditure, particularly as regards lactic acid/lactate metabolism; in fact, the term "oxygen debt" is still widely used to this day. However, direct and indirect calorimeter experiments have definitively disproven any association of lactate metabolism as causal to an elevated oxygen uptake.
Studies show that the EPOC effect exists after both anaerobic exercise and aerobic exercise. Such comparisons are problematic, however, in that it is difficult to equalize and subsequently compare workloads between the two types of exercise. For exercise regimens of comparable duration and intensity, aerobic exercise burns more calories during the exercise itself,[7] but the difference is partly offset by the higher increase in caloric expenditure that occurs during the EPOC phase after anaerobic exercise. Anaerobic exercise in the form of high-intensity interval training was also found in one study to result in greater loss of subcutaneous fat, even though the subjects expended fewer than half as many calories during exercise.[8] Whether this result was caused by the EPOC effect has not been established, and the caloric content of the participants' diet was not controlled during this particular study period.
In a 1992 Purdue study, results showed that high intensity, anaerobic type exercise resulted in a significantly greater magnitude of EPOC than aerobic exercise of equal work output.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excess_post-exercise_oxygen_consumption)
Arbicool wrote:
T兄除非你年紀不到二...(恕刪)
34歲，
基本上我是不想再討論這麼深奧的問題，我只是單純提供我看到的資訊，
一開始我也有講，公式準不準我不知道，誰誰誰的心跳區間在哪裡我不知道，
如果要討論這種心跳在什麼區間的問題，那麼很抱歉，我實在無法跟大家討論，
但是身體是我的，我知道我的心跳何時在有氧區何時在無氧區。並不是用什麼公式去算出來的。
我也相信專業運動員跟平民老百姓的心跳區間也不一樣，要如何公式化? 標準化?
如果依照公式，我的最大心率應該220-34 = 186，對吧? 但是我練腿，心跳都可以衝到190以上，
這又該如何用公式來計算? (不相信的話，下次我練腿，拍我的心跳錶照片)，搞不好我心臟比較小顆，
需要多跳幾下來輸送血液!
我分享這個公式的用意在於讓大家參考用這個文章所說的公式去看看，"心跳率影響卡路里消耗的多寡"，
也思考一下為什麼有人說中高強度的運動，所燃燒的卡路里會比較多? (HIIT、重訓)
就算我的運動都在無氧區，或是接近無氧區，又有何不可? 不論是消耗肝醣、血醣、蛋白質、還是脂肪，
都是身上的能量。卡路里一樣在消耗，對吧?
Thomas8610 wrote:
如果依照公式，我的最大心率應該220-34 = 186，對吧? 但是我練腿，心跳都可以衝到190以上，
這又該如何用公式來計算?..(恕刪)
這個公式指的是“平均”最大心跳率...正負1成..
由最大心跳率來得知“最佳”有氧區間.......
當然無氧區也會燃燒卡路里....
只是肝醣與脂肪的比例問題.......
若不是長時間有氧的情況...
其實沒什麼差別...
若是玩鐵人三項或是其中任何一項...
相同的心跳下，誰能使用的強度比較高.....
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X