Ryan0711 wrote:
大家熱列討論之後 ....(恕刪)
真的是缺一不可,別像小弟這樣,每次吵架都是為了摳摳
sony9 wrote:
愛情？
真愛？
大家有選擇權
難道交朋友你沒條件嗎？
選擇有錢的，就不是真愛？愛情.............聽你的咧。
誰要跟你一起吃苦？吃苦才是真愛？愛情？.........自我安慰。
不要宅在家了，有空出門看看花花世界。
您的邏輯還真經不起推敲
我同意的是“真愛是不可能被麵包打敗的”，而不是“沒有麵包的感情是不可能被麵包打敗的”
這個和條件有什麽關係？和吃苦又有什麽關係？還"自我安慰"咧，典型的宅男思維～
你手裏有一千萬，人家來個一億的追求者，你算不算讓你的另一半“吃苦”呢？
一說到真愛，就要往吃苦，往條件，往宅男上靠，動不動就“花花世界”，是不是您自己太狹隘了呢？
宅男別的不強，嘴炮最厲害了
建議您不要再宅了，去火星看看吧～
戀愛學分班2年級不及格生 愛食雞排飯
solargo wrote:
Well, if y...(恕刪)
DPP is party of loons, of nonsense, of intolerance and hatred, may it burn in hell.
And those people aren't being realistic, calling people who put love and food on the same balance materialistic is well-justified. Having more money is probably worth sacrificing their parents' love as well. Yeahhhh, since you can technically survive without parents but not without food, very "realistic", soullessly realistic.
Group intelligence is multiplicative when idiots are involved
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X