kirinbee wrote:
PLUS500就很好(恕刪)
https://en.globes.co.il/en/article-court-approves-class-action-on-alleged-plus500-manipulation-1001388525
Court approves class action on alleged Plus500 manipulation
法院批准對Plus500 涉嫌操縱的集體訴訟
The Tel Aviv District Court has not accepted the Israeli online trading firm's explanation of its pause mechanism and ordered Plus500 to provide details on all pauses in the past seven years.
特拉維夫地方法院沒有接受這家以色列在線貿易公司對其暫停機制的解釋，並命令 Plus500 提供過去七年所有暫停的詳細信息。
The Tel Aviv District Court has granted approval to litigate on a class action suit against Plus500 Israel, a subsidiary of global online trading services company Plus500 (LSE: PLUS), which is headquartered in Israel and has a market cap of £1.4 billion on the London Stock Exchange. Plus500 operates its online trading services in 32 languages allowing users to buy financial instruments in currencies, commodities and the indices of stock exchanges worldwide in real time.
特拉維夫地方法院已批准對全球在線交易服務公司 Plus500（倫敦證券交易所代碼：PLUS）的子公司 Plus500 Israel 提起集體訴訟，該公司總部位於以色列，其市值為 14 億英鎊。倫敦證券交易所。 Plus500 提供 32 種語言的在線交易服務，允許用戶實時購買貨幣、商品和全球證券交易所指數的金融工具。
In June 2016 Asher Torgeman bought put options on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange DAX index for €1,000 in the belief that in contradiction to the polls, the British would vote for Brexit in the UK referendum, thus causing European stock markets to fall. When the results showed that Brexit had prevailed, he asked to sell the options but was told he could not make the sell.
2016 年 6 月，Asher Torgeman 以 1,000 歐元的價格購買了法蘭克福證券交易所 DAX 指數的看跌期權，認為與民意調查相反，英國將在英國公投中投票支持脫歐，從而導致歐洲股市下跌。當結果顯示英國脫歐獲勝時，他要求賣出期權，但被告知無法賣出。
In response, Plus500 told Torgeman that following the UK referendum, "The German 30 instrument and all the options for that instrument were not available for trading because of the very high volatility in the market, which had created larger margins than usual …….. and that created high risk for traders. Accordingly, Plus500 had taken action to reduce this risk."
作為回應，Plus500 告訴 Torgeman，在英國公投之後，“德國 30 工具和該工具的所有期權都無法交易，因為市場波動性非常高，這創造了比平時更大的利潤......這給交易者帶來了高風險。因此，Plus500 已採取行動降低這種風險。”
Protecting customers?
Torgeman filed his suit through Adv. Hanoch Ehrlich of the Hadah Roth Shenhar Helfer & Co. law firm for approval to conduct a class action. In the request, it was claimed that trading was paused for 90 minutes only for those asking to sell put options. Although at the same time, trading in financial instruments that moved in the opposite direction - call options - and had fallen 76.51% continued as usual even though they were also based on the DAX. According to Torgeman, Plus500 did not renew options trading for 90 minutes, which violates many clauses in the Securities Law, and the aim was to prevent Plus500 from making losses.
保護客戶？
Torgeman 通過 Adv. Hadah Roth Shenhar Helfer & Co. 律師事務所的 Hanoch Ehrlich 請求批准進行集體訴訟。在請求中，聲稱只有那些要求賣出看跌期權的人才會暫停交易 90 分鐘。儘管與此同時，向相反方向移動的金融工具（看漲期權）的交易繼續像往常一樣下跌 76.51%，即使它們也是基於 DAX 的。根據托格曼的說法，Plus500在90分鐘內沒有更新期權交易，這違反了《證券法》中的許多條款，目的是為了防止Plus500出現虧損。
Plus500 claimed that the pause in trade is a mechanism, automatically operated in real time according to pre-determined criteria, which is designed first and foremost to protect customers. Plus500 also claimed that the mechanism operates symmetrically for both selling and buying of financial instruments regardless of the loss or profit at the time that the pause mechanism is operated. Plus500 attached an expert opinion from Prof. Avner Kalay, an expert in capital market trading and finance.
Judge Magen Altuvia dismissed the company's claim that this was an automatically operated defense mechanism. He said, "The work automatic should not be used to remove responsibility as if the act was not carried out by the company." He added, "Plus500 is responsible for programming the automatic software and feeds in the parameters for these pauses. It is up to it to prove that during the hour of the pause that it was designed for the benefit of its customers."
Plus500 聲稱交易暫停是一種機制，根據預先確定的標準實時自動運行，其設計初衷是為了保護客戶。 Plus500 還聲稱，無論暫停機制運行時的損失或利潤如何，該機制都對稱地用於金融工具的買賣。 Plus500附上了資本市場交易和金融專家Avner Kalay教授的專家意見。
Magen Altuvia 法官駁回了該公司關於這是一個自動運行的防禦機制的說法。他說，“自動工作不應該被用來免除責任，就好像該行為不是由公司執行的。”他補充說：“Plus500 負責對自動軟件進行編程並輸入這些暫停的參數。它有責任證明在暫停期間它是為客戶的利益而設計的。”
好棒棒的作帳
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X