• 4

Paypal 申訴成功,但是.......

r75761 wrote:
你當初付款不是透過e...(恕刪)


是透過ebay的連結
Thanks
Little Jack wrote:
其他像是鏡頭(小黑五 Sigma 10-20)等等的東西 也是有"便宜"可以撿

但是天下沒有白吃的午餐 我還是寧願去店裡買

當然有些東西像是收藏品 就只有賭賭運氣拉...(恕刪)



所以才有Paypal這種付款機制產生.....


Little Jack wrote:

基本上Paypal是一個很沒有ethics 也很沒有保障的一個公司

建議你以後不要用啦



感謝您的ebay經驗, 但是您還是沒有分享為什麼你會覺得Paypal不太好呢?

另外UPS也不好嗎?


ps: Sigma 10-20 店裡都比ebay便宜, 唉, ebay騙子可能是存在的.
看了這麼多, 有一點不了解

PAYPAL的補償是拿賣家帳戶裡的錢嗎? 如果是這樣, 何必有2000美元限制,
我一直以為是PAYPAL先拿錢賠償?

不過可以確定的是, EBAY的買賣如果是經PAYPAL付款, 去EBAY申訴時會轉到PAYPAL申訴去


Elaine Chen兄:
方便提供那個EBAY連結嗎
不知道現在ebay的規定有沒有改,2~3年前在美國ebay購物有交易糾紛(東西沒收到)
,我是直接向美國ebay客訴,而且雖然是透過paypal付款,但最後是收到ebay的支票退款
(ebay台灣分公司)
ruby6436 wrote:
PAYPAL的補償是拿賣家帳戶裡的錢嗎? 如果是這樣, 何必有2000美元限制,
我一直以為是PAYPAL先拿錢賠償?...(恕刪)


是PAYPAL賠錢.....

電子兔 wrote:
是PAYPAL賠錢....(恕刪)


我一直也認為如此,
可是為什麼前面一些ebay例子是賣家帳戶沒錢就不賠了???
I forward an article from www.screw-paypal.com

PayPal Claims "Excellent" Buyer Protection

This is a lie. First PayPal makes it impossible for most people to qualify for the "buyer protection." It is a bait and switch routine. They advertise a great program, then make it impossible to qualify for.

Second, PayPal says in its User Agreement "We reimburse Users for losses only to the extent we are able to recover the funds from sellers."

Yup, even if you are somehow able to qualify for the buyer "protection," it is almost without meaning. PayPal says their ability to offer them any kind of protection is only to the extent that PayPal can get the money back from the seller! The seller drains his account, no money for the buyer. And no money from PayPal to the buyer! Sound "excellent" to you?

There's more: PayPal, again if you qualify for "top tier" coverage, covers your losses up to $2,000 (only with eBay transactions). If you manage to qualify for the "basic tier" coverage, you only get covered for up to $200 (on eBay and qualified items purchased outside of eBay).

There's other stuff PayPal won't cover either: "These programs only cover payments for tangible, physical goods. All other payments, such as payments for intangibles, services, airline flight tickets, or licenses and other access to digital content are not covered by any Buyer Protection Program that we offer."

What is funny about that is this: In other advertising PayPal claims its service is PERFECT to buy and sell non-tangible services! PayPal markets its service for all service related industries (like web design, legal, airline, tickets, etc) -- with the promise of PayPal's "excellent" buyer and seller protection. Bullshit PayPal.
PayPal says their ability to offer them any kind of protection is only to the extent that PayPal can get the money back from the seller!

看到這一段
MerlinWang wrote:
但是您還是沒有分享為什麼你會覺得Paypal不太好呢?...(恕刪)


因為網路上有太多的人幹絞 它被告也不是沒有原因的

我是不需要自己去踩那顆地雷

它的policy也有大大貼出來了 大家看的到

反倒是我開始好奇 您是Paypal股東嗎? 還是它的死忠粉司阿?

It doesn't really matter whether I have used PayPal or not. As far as credibility goes, you are claiming that you had success with PayPal. Well good for you, but as far as I am concerned many more people have shared their “screwed by PayPal” story on the Internet. This would at least suggest that while some people like you are happy with Paypal, many more are displeased with what they have to offer. Oh let’s not forget the class-action lawsuits against PayPal. Based on that, I pretty much made up my mind that I won’t be doing business with PayPal.


Little Jack wrote:
反倒是我開始好奇 您是Paypal股東嗎? 還是它的死忠粉司阿?...(恕刪)


沒有啊, 怎麼會.

我是好奇, 您是不是有什麼慘痛經驗, 不然怎麼會有這麼嚴厲的指責.


Little Jack wrote:
基本上Paypal是一個很沒有ethics 也很沒有保障的一個公司.(恕刪)




不過每個公司生意做大了, 本來就有許多人痛罵的.

哪一家公司你覺得沒被罵過呢?
  • 4
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?