nakoru wrote:
小弟對邏輯製程一竅不...(恕刪)
說真的
小弟對韓國三星這次大舉投資心存懷疑?
因為三星真的有那麼多錢嗎?
政府真的會給他一次燒那麼多錢嗎?
而且他一次要打的不只10個喔!
這樣就資源分散了!
想必這一招可能是"七傷拳"
三星對付這些DRAM廠
將來大舉投資後如果還沒倒
存活下來的將是最優秀的
且會是三星永遠的痛
ycweng wrote:
寧可大家都當不成老闆...(恕刪)
沒錯，大大講到重點了；都做了幾年的老闆了，還甘願被別人管嗎??
哀，台灣人都是寧為雞首不為牛後的心態......
上一波沒整併成功，根本就沒戲唱了......
Economies of scale, in microeconomics, are the cost advantages that a business obtains due to expansion. They are factors that cause a producer’s average cost per unit to fall as scale is increased. Economies of scale is a long run concept and refers to reductions in unit cost as the size of a facility, or scale, increases.[2] Diseconomies of scale are the opposite. Economies of scale may be utilized by any size firm expanding its scale of operation. The common ones are purchasing (bulk buying of materials through long-term contracts), managerial (increasing the specialization of managers), financial (obtaining lower-interest charges when borrowing from banks and having access to a greater range of financial instruments), and marketing (spreading the cost of advertising over a greater range of output in media markets). Each of these factors reduces the long run average costs (LRAC) of production by shifting the short-run average total cost (SRATC) curve down and to the right.
BEYOND IMAGINATION | NO PAINS, NO GAINS | WHAT GOES AROUND, COMES AROUND
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X