因為顏色好美 紅的好誘人
但是看到這篇文章，真的得再思考了
希望事情能圓滿落幕
brougham wrote:
如果更換原廠玻璃還是會有同樣的狀況發生嗎?
CX5 Issue Report
Issue Reported: JUN 04, 2014
Vehicle: 2014 Mazda CX-5
NHTSA: Action Number: 1072298 Service Bulletin Number: 10596246
Component: visibility/wiper
Summary: In about one year and 12,000 miles this is the second cracked windshield i have had. This time i was driving and heard a pop. One minute later, there was a crack at the bottom of the windshield. No hits by a rock, nothing. This is an structural part of the car that is failing constantly, according to other mazda owners and mazda is looking the other way and denying that they have a problem. As somebody has said, it is probable that in order to save weight they made the windshield too thin, and it fails after a few months of service due to excessive stress. When you go to the dealer, they run the "pencil test", an idiotic way to test stress and they tell you that a rock hit your car.
以上是美國車主的心聲,你可以參考一下,應該有回答到你的問題!一般人不可能有大批的統計資訊,此為個案或通案請自行斟酌
再補充一個更有公信力的網站:These complaints & problems includes information received by NHTSA from consumers either directly or as recorded by the Vehicle Safety Hotline
車主抱怨在馬自達經銷商換完破裂的前擋玻璃,24小時內又破掉啦
我只知道全壘打有back-to-back,沒想到破玻璃也有back-to-back為海軍收戰果 為陸軍做先鋒
看完連結那篇文章，你就會得到答案!
DULAMO wrote:
不知道那些找 " 國外" 的人, 有沒有同步找其它車的資料?' ...(恕刪)
現在cx5有問題，難道已經接手多時的日馬還想要親自把自己的招牌砸了嗎?
如果馬六、馬三、cx5的玻璃都是同樣的廠商提供，那我真的不太敢現在下手買車
很怕還要自己出險去換副廠安全一點的玻璃，這真的會被友人笑掉大牙(迷之音，推你森林人不聽==)
糟糕了~~馬牌一直強調自己努力、創新、用心的研發新科技跟新技術
卻連帶研發出超乎全球車廠的藝術性擋風玻璃，
問題是這玻璃我不是要放家裡觀賞用的阿?他再有靈性的畢卡索揮毫式自裂，我也沒心情去觀賞阿!!!
反而擔心這樣的頗具靈性的幽靈馬車會影響全家老小的行車安全呢~~~
馬自達好心點，這種品質的高科技玻璃拿去擺在你們歷史博物館或展示間當炒作話題就好
千萬不要再拿到實車上面運用了~
不然叫我們這些公幹他牌偷配備偷防滑的車友，如何對面神車友人的質疑呢?
一句我家的車雖然少了幾顆氣球跟沒有防滑，但起碼上高速公路不用擔心玻璃自裂體驗敞篷享受的高危險
還要擔心廣播發布的颱風特報的風速、雨量，同時在高速公路行車時親自體驗~~光這點就被打臉到爆~~
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X