ruby6436 wrote:
基本上他的文章和L版...(恕刪)
抱歉文章沒看清楚~
malinger0316 wrote:
just to re...(恕刪)
in case you can't understand the purpose of police report and public record.
i don't mind give you a lesson in that.
police official report was filed on 10/15/2009. Recorded as county record on 12/09/2009.
Release to public on 1/28/10.
As it stands, police report is admissible as evidence in court.
While you may not like it, the police report investigation is closed.
From police point of view, this case is shut and close.
Since no one has brought this case to trial (both civil and criminal). No case has been started, therefore no case to be closed.
But police investigation are done and report is finalized whether you like it or not.
Fan boy- whatever.
Truth is truth. Case closed.
malinger0316 wrote:
just to remind you
this is only a report
not an "case close" from court
court still needs to claim who to blame to...
plz watch this video (youtube) and there are questions I want to ask you,
Do you think Toyota has nothing to blame with this accident?
Do you think the safty system in Toyota is perfect and nothing needs to be changed or fixed?
Do you think unproper floormat is the thing to cause the car to be outrage and unstoppable ?
Are you a Toyota Fanboy?
PS: AOL sucks in USA, only cavemen still use it... lol)
1. If the dealer place wrong mats that caused pedal to be stuck, why is this toyota's fault? This is dealer's problem. dealer are 3rd party entity in US. By law no automobile manufacturer can sell car directly to consumer.
2. No- i did not say that. I have my doubt. But not for you and i to comment on it, since none of us work of toyota. The point of discussion forum is to discuss topic logically not lies. The fact of matter is that investigation in this case is closed by police. Court case has nothing to do with finding and conclusion of the investigation. This is where you are wrong.
3. Out rage? please. In this case on the ES350. While the pedal is stuck to the floor, the vehicle was traveling at 120 mph. Hardly beyond ES350 capability. (The electronic limiter on ES350 is 125 mph). It is still below that.
Unstoppable- says who? The fact of matter is that same situation occurred 3 days earlier and that driver brought the car under control by not panicking and followed the right procedure.
In case you don't know how vaccum system works, please do some research. While Toyota is at fault for not having brake override, many company has the same problem. Including honda. Therefore that should not be used as sole reason to drill toyota. Simple as that.
This case is simple. The dealer screwed up by using the wrong all weather floor mat. Dealer needs to be shot. Toyota is partially at fault since it does not have brake override. But brake override is not required by law. Hence you can't pin that on toyota.
My point is simple. This case has nothing to do with gas pedal recall, nor problem with electronic throttle and should not be part of discussion or support claim of electronic throttle failure.
Simple as that.
Fan boy? hardly. Present truthful information- yes.
I don't like how toyota handled this mess. But this does not mean as public you or i have right to wrongfully mis-represent information to slander a company.
You need to grow up and understand purpose of discussion. Discussing a matter truthfully and without bias is what i want.
Too bad the many sales in this forum is ruining it.
Pink Floyd wrote:
K大的神勇不是後生小輩可以知道的~
雖遠住美利堅,但憑雙碩士學位,自持這種高貴身份,
對台灣車壇是如數家珍,鐵口直斷!
最喜歡拿LS400比A32,把A32拼評得一文不值,
也喜歡拿BMW 530來批評Honda S2000的低速扭力不足,
然後再拿Camry來批評BMW操控也沒啥了不起
...
眾多豐功偉業,吳嘉偉終於被當時BBS汽車版網友封為汽車版皇帝,
還有好幾輯皇帝名言錄!
唉呀!不好意思,隨口洩露了皇帝的名諱,真是該死!
...(恕刪)
難怪喔.....剛正想說這裡的60樓K大說
http://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=264&t=1409626&p=6
---------
這樣講好了
W211 SBC pump 失效
導致完全無煞車
那 benz 不能買了
而 BMW 之前還有 steering angle sensor 掛了
導致所有的電子安全系統全掛
本田之前五速自排變速箱在高速行駛時可能從五擋直接縮擋到二擋
導致車子失控
所以雙 B 根本田都不用買了
都有問題
（這上面三個問題我通通都有親身經驗）
---------
原來是皇帝喔....難怪經歷過那3大問題後
還只是為T/L車滅火而已
並沒有用這樣的熱心與時間來對那3個牌子的車廠開炮
真的不是我們一般平民的肚量呀
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X