• 77

自刪自刪自刪

還是要看看各車款的設計, 2011NHTSA標准下,(都6個安全氣囊以上)
Prius/Sienna表現都很好.
但Carmy/corolla/yaris 不甚理想

國產Toyota, 就算車體沒偷工,但少了氣囊保護, 就算拿到國外測應該都0分吧.....


http://www.safercar.gov/Vehicle+Shoppers/5-Star+Safety+Ratings/2011-Newer+Vehicles/Search-Results?startpage=8&pagesize=10&vclass=&model=&year=&manufacturer=122&searchtype=manufacturer&make1=&make2=&model1=&model2=&year1=&year2=&compcars=&byyear=&classSelect=&pagesize=10
國產車..都是一樣...鈑金薄

但是..鈑金..不是安全保障..好看而已..不過現在新車..好像比以前..鈑金軟

偷偷去公司停車場..試過..老車比較不容易..用手幾押匯變形...感覺

T牌..GOA車體..我看過文章..指的應該是指..大力撞擊時..多大力...我不知道

利用車子零件..鈑金潰縮..避免.."車室"受到擠押變形...

嚴重一點..正面撞擊..引勤和..方向機住..會會自動掉下來..避免擠壓..駕駛者

基本上..沒側面氣囊的車..都不可能是5星..管你撞擊分數多高..每一年5星的定義是不一樣的

5年前5星不代表...現在5星

還有...大撞小..都是小的輸的機會大

不同等級..禍車禍現場圖..參考而以拉...

沒有哪一家車商...會拿自己的車...撞擊..對手同等級的車

奸商....譬如說..F牌不是硼鋼A/B住...聽起來很強對吧..那他怎麼不用這台車..

撞T牌C車...撞贏了車子多好賣...

都是車商的手斷拉...

台製原廠...傳動軸..用...硼鋼做的耶...軸而以拉..長長那一隻

聽說不會斷...宣傳手法...正常行駛..有幾個人開到斷的阿...

看看就好
神戶齊 wrote:
不需要阿我知道台灣最...(恕刪)


80,90,100,110怎麼辦?縮更大?縮更裡面?






Each car tested is subjected to an offset impact into an immovable block fitted with a deformable aluminium honeycomb face. This impact is intended to represent the most frequent type of road crash, resulting in serious or fatal injury. It simulates one car having a frontal impact with another car of similar mass. As most frontal crashes involve only part of the car’s front, the test is offset to replicate a half width impact between the cars. In the test, this is replicated by having 40 percent of the car impact the barrier. The barrier face is deformable to represent the deformable nature of the cars. This test is a severe test of the car’s ability to survive the impact without suffering passenger compartment intrusion.

Contact between the occupant and intruding parts of the passenger compartment is the main cause of serious and fatal injuries, for restrained adult car occupants. The test speed of 64 km/h represents a car to car collision with each car travelling at around 55 km/h. The difference in speed is due to the energy absorbed by the deformable face. Accident research has shown that this impact speed covers a significant proportion of serious and fatal accidents. By preventing intrusion, the chances of the occupant impacting the car’s interior is minimised with space remaining for the restraint system to operate effectively.
viper2736 wrote:
80,90,100,...(恕刪)


時速100不錯啊,我是對Golf沒興趣

它是縮的更裡面拉

那po個Rva4的吧,看看有沒有比較好,還是比較差
請勿購買韓國品牌,買伊索比亞的產品人家還會和您說謝謝,買韓國產品他們只會笑你笨再桶你一刀

神戶齊 wrote:
時速100不錯啊,我...(恕刪)


僅做車輛安全測試分析

與T牌護衛隊無任何關聯

viper2736 wrote:
僅做車輛安全測試分析...(恕刪)


那就

時速100撞起來一定會比較遭

這主題是
請問TOYOTA真的有那麼不安全嘛??

針對主題..當然要提出TOYOTA哪安全了!!是吧^ ^
請勿購買韓國品牌,買伊索比亞的產品人家還會和您說謝謝,買韓國產品他們只會笑你笨再桶你一刀
神戶齊 wrote:
那就時速100撞起來...(恕刪)


針對其中回覆 對於車輛安全的判斷提出修正

提供正確多元的車輛安全思維



正確多元的討論及觀念 相互切磋砥礪



應該是沒那麼嚴重吧...至少TOYOTA在國內還是數一數二的
沒錯 頭又大是在國內數一數二 不安全車種之一 可以贏過大概只有熊貓車吧
我只知道真正有能力也想買進口車的人,不會去評論任何一牌國產車..因為本來就不是他們的菜,為何要去質疑,還跟人蓋了幾十層樓
  • 77
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 77)
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?