SongLin4756 wrote:
謝謝大家 我也是有...(恕刪)
我身邊一堆 高齡者
車上有定速 連定速都不太會用
https://www.wired.com/story/tesla-autopilot-why-crash-radar/
The same is true for any car currently equipped with adaptive cruise control, or automated emergency braking. It sounds like a glaring flaw, the kind of horrible mistake engineers race to eliminate. Nope. These systems are designed to ignore static obstacles because otherwise, they couldn't work at all.
“You always have to make a balance between braking when it’s not really needed, and not braking when it is needed,” says Erik Coelingh, head of new technologies at Zenuity, a partnership between Volvo and Autoliv formed to develop driver assistance technologies and self-driving cars. He's talking about false
positives. On the highway, slamming the brakes for no reason can be as dangerous as not stopping when you need to.
“The only safe scenario would be don’t move,” says Aaron Ames, from Caltech’s Center for Autonomous Systems and Technologies. That doesn't exactly work for driving. “You have to make reasonable assumptions about what you care about and what you don’t.”
qweertw wrote:
ACC跟車系統確實是...(恕刪)
ACC AEB FCM 都能增加行車安全
重點應該是了解跟熟悉
樓主說年紀大了 反應有影響是可以理解的啦
至於買CRV outlander 或是有大大推薦日蝕
就看自己本身的預算囉
用車環境主要是雙北市區,偶而上高速公路或快速道路到其它北部縣市.
我開車一向很專心,幾乎不分心,也更不會打瞌睡.視線不離開前方,設定音響或冷氣也都很謹慎.視線也盡可能不離開前方車況路況,
因為我知道車子就是只有我在操作,絕不能分心,也不能依賴"它人".
我喜歡開車,很喜歡開車,我認為開車是一種樂趣.所以能開車我就會自己開車.
以我的用車環境而言,根本連定速都不太用的到.20年來用不到100次,平均兩個月用不到一次.估計平均每兩個月用定速行駛不到5公里.
我比較相信自己,連設定定速時,腳也不太敢離開油門及剎車塔踏板.深怕有狀況時,腳板會反應不及.
也因此我覺得定速帶來減輕駕駛疲勞的程度,其實對我的而言,根本沒什麼幫助.所以近幾年很少使用,一年約一次吧!
(主要也是測試定速有沒有壞)
坦白說,原本我也認為ACC AEB等等,這些安全配備對我沒甚用.不過看到大家都普遍認為這是趨勢.
看來下一部車,也該認真考慮有這些配備,以便跟上潮流,享受開車時能一面恍神及打顆睡的樂趣.醒過來時目的地就到了,這種神奇的科技!
最後再加上一项建議,就是政府看能否立法:未來只要購買擁有這些安全配備的車,只要駕駛時開啟,那無論發生何種車禍,駕駛者擁有絕對免責權,責任完全由車商背負,駕駛人或車受損時還能獲得理賠.
那就更完美了,沒有懸念,無須猶豫,買定了.
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X