Motor Trend 報導: 2017 HONDA CR-V VS. 2017 MAZDA CX-5

這篇文章今天才出來,比較2017 CRV AWD vs. CX-5 AWD.

http://www.motortrend.com/cars/honda/cr-v/2017/2017-honda-cr-v-vs-2017-mazda-cx-5-comparison-review/

這次他們的結論似乎很簡單,CR-V加速比較快,空間比較好,又更省油,所以Motor Trend推薦CR-V. 當然這是在美國的結論. 會不會因地不同? 不知道!

This time, though, we don’t necessarily have to couch it that way. Yes, the Mazda CX-5 is prettier, more luxurious, and a little more fun to drive, but the Honda CR-V is just damn good. If you want to be coldly rational, the CR-V has more space, gets better fuel economy, has more-advanced technology, and is cheaper to own. It’s also very good to drive. In the past, we lead-footed sports car lovers might have excused the Mazda’s deficiencies in exchange for its lusty driving experience. But this time, we have no hesitation in recommending the CR-V to enthusiasts as well as our automotively apathetic friends and family. It’s a narrow margin of victory, but whether your other car is a Camaro or a Corolla, if you want a compact crossover, you’ll be slightly better served by the new Honda CR-V.
2017-06-06 0:23 發佈
很明顯看得出Earth Dream CVT加速性一點也不輸一般自排

Monte920 wrote:
這篇文章今天才出來...(恕刪)

0~60mph只要7.5秒 對一台CVT+1.5升渦輪的休旅車來說 真的很快
國產一些更大排量+渦輪的車款都不一定能達到
美國的CX5 搭的是2.5升的引擎...
所以在動力方面看來CRV 1.5T 比起台灣CX5的2.0升版本是樂勝了
但是安全性, 組裝品質, CP值
進口CX5比起國產CRV來說還是比較優
就看消費者的優先順序了吧!




hungmaxy wrote:
0~60mph只要7.5秒 對一台CVT+1.5升渦輪的休旅車來說 真的很快
國產一些更大排量+渦輪的車款都不一定能達到恕刪)


納智傑躺著也中槍

pengyc wrote:
納智傑躺著也中槍...(恕刪)


是你把納智傑推出來中槍的
唯有那些眼裡只有撈錢的業代才會昧著良心吹噓自己車廠車子
這次CR-V改的不差啊!!
換上了渦輪 整個加速性還不錯
且更省油了 空間也不錯
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?