其實台福的安全性也只是半調子.....相對台灣的車子安全配備而言,比較安全點台福再不改行銷時就把所有安全配備列出來,然後再把安全配備分散賣的習慣....就不要再強調車子的安全性....實在讓人厭煩!!mauricio wrote:參考什麼?..Kug...(恕刪)
hsiangchieh wrote:事實就是: 在測試上CR-V得到Marginal,Escape得到Poor講再多~ 也不能改變KUGA測出來就是POOR的結果!(恕刪) 對我是無法改變Escape得到Poor的評價但得到Poor就等於那款車是非常不安全嗎CR-V得到Marginal評價,就等於CR-V非常安全嗎有沒看到二者在車體結構安全上都是得到Poor評價(圖紅圈處)這顯示著Escape、CR-V在車體結構安全上都是Poor不及格在臀/大腿(圖藍圈處)上,Escape是輸給CR-V在小腿/腳掌(圖綠圈處)上,CR-V則略遜Escape
毀滅之神-棄天帝 wrote:對我是無法改變Esc...(恕刪) IIHS - 2013 Hyundai Tucson /ix35/ small overlap crash test / POOR EVALUATION" target="_blank">IIHS - 2013 Ford Escape /Kuga/ small overlap crash test / POOR EVALUATION /" target="_blank">---------------------------------------------------------------------------IIHS - 2012 Honda CRV small overlap crash test / MARGINAL EVALUATION /" target="_blank">IIHS - 2013 Volkswagen Tiguan small overlap crash test / MARGINAL EVALUATION" target="_blank">IIHS - 2013 Mazda CX5 small overlap crash test / MARGINAL EVALUATION /" target="_blank">IIHS - 2012 Nissan Rogue small overlap crash test / MARGINAL EVALUATION /" target="_blank">-----------------------------------------------------------------------------IIHS - 2012 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport /ASX/ small overlap crash test / ACCEPTABLE" target="_blank">-----------------------------------------------------------------------------IIHS - 2014 Subaru Forester small overlap crash test / GOOD EVALUATION /" target="_blank">
Toyota 買下Subaru 股權的原因就是因為 Subaru 底盤跟引擎很強。其實TOYOTA 86 是Subaru 一手設計生產的。02 Forester S wrote:Subaru Forester 森林人