文包 wrote:
這些書我都看過了. ...
與其教別人去看書. 不如直接把書中文句分享上來...
(恕刪)
ok, that's it, no further reply,
And sorry to 老禪師 for the change of subject.
Stetho wrote:
路過：
感覺上好像是一個吵架讀書會，分為AB兩組，
定期聚會，定期抬槓。
簡單的話題，複雜化；白話文，文言化
chiang名言 : "如果覺得01變了也不相信我，那就離開吧..." 01不過就是這麼玩意兒~ http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/
原文如下 ~
using two contaxes.he took 106 pictures of the bloody battle on the beach before rushing back through the surf to clamber on to a landing craft returning to the invasion fleet offshore.
a week later he learned that most of his pictures had been destroyed by a darkroom assistant in landon who became so excited that he tried to hasten the drying process by turning up the heat. and melted the images off the negatives.
only eight frames could be savaged.(in later years there were persistent rumours that the darkroom assistant was Larry Burrows.subsequently a famous life photographer who was killed in Vietnam.but Ed Thompson says this is nonsense.)
Life first told Capa that the pictures were spoiled becase sea weater had leaked into his cameras so when he discovered what had really happened he was doubly furious.but at same time he told Life editors he would never work for them again if they fired the assistant who was responsible.
When the magazine finally ran the redeemable photographs it attemped to explain their quality by claiming that Capa had not focused properly in the heat of battle.
further enraging him.(when he wrote a colourful.not to say fanciful.autobiography afterr the war he called it"Slightly Out Of Focus"as a bitter jibe at the Life editors.)
重點 關鍵是這段 為何會模糊
相信大家都看得懂英文 就不再翻譯
如有打錯字 請回文指正
補充~
會花些時間打字 主要是剛好看到此版一些爭論 心裡很感慨
前日半夜拍貓頭鷹時 7-11補充食物 朋友看到海報上的照片問我打幾個閃燈
朋友解說時 提到專業攝影師曾告訴他這是很流行的林布蘭特光線打法
聽後 真是哭笑不得 林布蘭特天上有知 不知是何感想
現今網路發達 太多的網路的錯誤訊息 以訛傳訛
上網得錯誤知識 確不買書真正學知識 不僅誤人也誤己
期待大家共勉
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X