IvanTseng wrote:
先說明，小弟個人現在主力還是底片，
數位只是拿來記錄用，純粹生活照...
但如果給兩張一樣構圖卻分由數位與底片拍的圖，
我的確相信給個高手努力地PS，
應該可以弄出以假亂真的底片味....
而且您提到的上述連結的說明，
我稍微瞄了一下而已，但似乎是在說明數位的畫質已經勝過底片了!?
似乎與底不底片味沒有很大的關聯?? @@a
以下圖為例，倘若我若不說，
又有誰能一眼就輕易斷定這是底片或數位呢? @@
嗯!
您可以看一下timparkin第六篇的回文
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?topic=60589.0
That sounds about right to me. One thing is clear from the print analysis is that extra resolution does not necessarily mean a sharper looking print. The Mamiya is a classic in this in that it outresolves the D3X quite substantially but does not look it at print sizes. I was mightily impressed with the Nikon D3X and the Nikon 24 tilt shift was substantially better than the Canon 24 TSEmk2 tilt shift that we had (which tallies with the copy I used to own but a colleague seems to have a sharp copy which I look forward to testing). I would say that the 4x5 and IQ180 are closely matches with mid res contrast going to the IQ180 but fine detail going to the 4x5. In blind print tests, the film was chosen mostly at small sizes (tonality I think) and people were split between 4x5 and IQ180 at large (40x50) print sizes. Some liking the clean look of the IQ180, others saying that it didn't look as 'real' as the 4x5. All but on of my 8 person sample chose the 8x10 Portra though at this large print size though. The sample was chosen from non-photographer family members so far - boring them to tears on christmas eve :-)
Tim
這裡的一些講法，我本身也有相同的經驗。頂級的數位機背"利"是"利"了，但利到
有點"假假"的感覺。
當然這些也是看了實體的圖片給我的直接的感覺。
(展間50~60吋數位機背所拍出來的圖片)
就像"唱片"和"CD、dvd、bd"之間(音樂性)給我的感覺是相同的，
就是少了那一些些"溫暖"又"舒服"的感覺
我本身也是底片、數位都有拍，其實，底片和數位，皆有其長處。
但是現階段來說，只要是重要的場合，我第一優先，還是底片。
總而言之
如果要底片味，拍底片就對了
要方便，拍數位的也不錯!
數位的東西，要搞出"底片味"，我個人認為是不必要&不可能的。
因為基本上，這是兩種完全兩碼子的事，。
拍底片，大家加油了!
