圖：Ori Gersht,"Time After Time"(2008) / 這一張照片價值8000英鎊（以台幣匯率五十元來算就是四十萬台幣）
WHO IS ORI GERSHT？（http://www.ucreative.ac.uk/index.cfm?articleid=15756）
1.Explain:How does the Abyss between the present of the event and the present of looking charge the photographic narrative?
2.Explain:The Marvel of photographs that they represent what is absent.
3.In what ways the disccontinuity presented in photographs differ from real life-experiences and from recollections of memories.
4.When we find a photograph meaningful, we are lending it a past and a present, give examples based on a specific photograph.
5.Explain:Discontinuity always produce ambiguity.
6.How a drawing differ from a photograph.
7.Are the appearences that the camera transports are cultural artefacts (man made) or are they like a foot print in the sand (a trace, naturally left by something that has past) ?
8.What does J.Berger mean when he claims that photography does not posses a language but painting does?
9.The camera does not lie, even when it is used to quote a lie, this makes the lie appear more truful.
10.Why an X RAY photograph can tell utter truth but a photograph about man's experience can not?
11.Why and how photographs give meaning to facts?
Key words forPhotographic Narrative:
Irrefutable evidence
Arresting the flow of time = Disscontinuity
Ambiguity
Mystery
Meaning
Captions
Interpretation
Inclusion - exclusion
Confirmation of the thereness of the world
Some notes by me:
Make a lie more believeable→very powerful !!
Working on what is not in a photograph than what is in.
Photograph is a start point, a triger.
這些問題花了我一百萬台幣，如果對攝影有興趣的人不妨跟我一起思考這些問題。
