• 2

問一個攝影史問題

請教板上神人一個攝影史問題。

請問馬格蘭攝影通訊社是什麼時候開始失去了圖片供應的功能呢? 根本沒有看過有新聞圖片是他所提供的。還是說他們從來就沒有提供新聞圖片的功能,只是專搞深度紀實攝影的公司呢?
2014-07-18 0:45 發佈
文章關鍵字 問題
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07393148.2010.520437#.U8hXEJSSw09

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17512780802681363?journalCode=rjop20#.U8hX2ZSSw09

第169~179頁
http://www.2ip.es/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/2013-Journalism-New_Challenges-Fowler-Watt_and_Allan-v1-02.pdf#page=185
答案是一開始就沒有此功能。 是各地失意的商業攝影師們湊合為生活打拼。 :-)對二戰後偶然聚會上的香檳酒有疑問嗎?
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnum_Photos
感謝伯義,xdaiii,還有胡董,原來是這樣啊。感恩啦!
DU 雙魚的海邊
這類八卦之前就有
http://www.books.com.tw/products/CN10093911
http://www.books.com.tw/products/CN11034950

下個月台灣會有台灣盜版書籍決定性的瞬間在書店販賣,不過中國已經先盜再說.也是八卦在裡頭.
http://www.books.com.tw/products/CN11030585


拍越南公司的Philip Jones Griffiths : I have known Marin Parr for almost 20 years and during that time I have observed his career with interest. He is an unusual photographer in the sense that he has always shunned the values that Magnum was built on. Not for him any of our concerned ‘finger on the pulse of society’ humanistic photography. He preached against us and was bold enough to deride us in print while his career as an ‘art’ photographer mushroomed…When he applied for associate membership I pointed out that our acceptance of him into Magnum would be more than simply taking on another photographer. It would be the embracing of a sworn enemy whose meteoric rise in Magnum was closely linked with the moral climate of Thatcher’s rule. His penchant for kicking the victims of Tory violence cause me to describe his pictures as ‘fascistic’ … Today he wants to be a member. The vote will be a declaration of who we are and a statement of how we see ourselves. His membership would not be a proclamation of diversity but the rejection of those values that have given Magnum the status it has in the world today. Please don’t dismiss what I am saying as some kind of personality clash. Let me state that I have great respect for him as the dedicated enemy of everything I believe in and, I trust, what Magnum still believes in.


新聞圖片還是有在提供如張乾琦的緬甸給NPR, CONTACT 給時代. 這類都算是供稿.
https://www.magnumphotos.com/C.aspx?VP3=SearchResult&ALID=2K1HRGQRLEI
http://lightbox.time.com/2011/11/16/the-singular-approach-chien-chi-changs-contact-sheets/#1
7daysinmyanmar.com/newsletter/Myanmar_Newsletter.pdf
http://events.magnumphotos.com/C.aspx?VP3=SearchResult&ALID=2K1HRG71HY1B










郭大爛 wrote:
請教板上神人一個攝影...(恕刪)

xdaiii wrote:
這類八卦之前就有ht...(恕刪)


xdaiii兄 太神了... @@
DU 雙魚的海邊
思想的眼楮:布列松論攝影我有買,內容實在是....
不知是盜版的關係,還是布列松本身文筆就很差的關係,總之就是很跳tone

OriginStar wrote:
思想的眼楮:布列松論...(恕刪)


感謝OriginStar兄
等等來去書店看看翻譯的內容
當事人文筆很差也是有可能的 XD
DU 雙魚的海邊
台灣出版品翻譯品質真的每下愈況
很大一部分是對岸翻譯帶壞了.....從前最怕就是作者天外插來一筆的東西, (例如資訊的書籍突然提到一個戲劇裏的人物)除非運氣好正好知道, 否則翻譯者只能音譯混過去, 現在網路發達,應該是太大的方便才是, 但確造成一大堆沒學識沒常識靠個翻譯機就來混的譯者
別懷疑, 很多台灣資深翻譯者應該也是掛名而已, 我發現太多近年台灣出版社作品當中不小心混入很多大陸用詞....許多譯者不但是台灣人而且還有市極資深優秀的譯者......掛羊頭賣狗肉到令人髮指的地步
  • 2
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?