• 4

底片新手 對於底片的一些疑問

利用去公司前十分鐘空檔在回一下好了


以五年前來說好了(這很重要)
(因為十年太久~兩年又太短)

若是都以單張照片本身來比
隨便一台隨身的底片機拍的
底片上所能記錄的訊息都遠高過任何高階DSLR拍攝的

單純就線條的銳利
畫面的細緻度來說
8X10的大小下數位已經很明顯的勝出
若是把眼光落在階調上
則數位還是遠不及底片
放大超過8X10則是底片放的好

只是數位的發展真的很可怕
每隔幾年就倍翻一次
五年前的頂級機種所能記錄的資訊
和現下頂級機種能記錄的已經完全是兩回事了

當數位機的畫數超過底片所能承載的最大資訊時
........

嘆.....這麼幾句居然花了我十分鐘
我到公司再繼續寫.....
到狗窩裡說狗臭 豈有不被狗咬的道理
很久沒拍底片了,但是十多年前,曾經遊歷美國。因為飛了數個地方,大多數時候,都有要求並且獲得手檢。但是,有一兩個機場自己太懶,就讓它過手提行李的X光機。回台後,有些照片洗出來明顯地有條紋。雖然年代久遠,但是從來沒拍過ISO400以上的底片。

現在科技日益發達,防堵恐怖活動越來越嚴格,甚至在同一個機場內都還要過個兩三道檢查。除非你像我當年並不是很在乎,不然的話還是不要嘗試吧。
"Unlike some innovations, such as the CD replacing the LP, digital does not jump over the benefits of film far enough to create the kind of transformation that CDs did to records," he said.

"Film is not going to go away because it is the best way to get a print. We have to get to that point with digital."


Quite frankly people do not want films or digital cameras they just want pictures - Dan Carp, Kodak CEO

"If you go back in time images were the best tool for communication and are still the best way to communicate across cultures and age groups."


Reference URL:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/2278678.stm

Remark by Raymond:

"Just for communication across cultures and age groups." Not for all.

Printing? I doubt digital step down is good enough to against Analog!

A great tool set for fine art photography? maybe, maybe not! It's your call.

Digital and Analog is always in a "similar" context! Not the same! So please stop argue on this.

我韃韃的馬蹄 是美麗的錯誤 我 不是歸人 只是個過客

haytt wrote:


Referenc...(恕刪)


好吧~千言萬語勝不過你上面那幾句


所以~~~我閉嘴了
到狗窩裡說狗臭 豈有不被狗咬的道理
ankochiu wrote:
好吧~千言萬語勝不過...(恕刪)
我韃韃的馬蹄 是美麗的錯誤 我 不是歸人 只是個過客
  • 4
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?