小弟於近日內即將購入A700,但爬了許多文章之後,覺得很多前輩都推薦1680z這顆菜頭,頓時讓我陷入是否該買kit(配16-105)還是買單機直上16-80z呢? 還麻煩各位前輩給我多點建議,謝謝
16-105 畫質普通旅遊鏡
原廠鏡
1. A700 + 16-80
2. A700 + 18-250 (犧牲一些畫質換一鏡到底的旅遊鏡)
不排斥副廠鏡
1. A700 + T 17-50 (焦段輸 16-80 畫質差不多 熟悉後再補其他焦段)
2. A700 + S 18-50 (焦段輸 16-80 畫質差不多 熟悉後再補其他焦段)
3. A700 + T 18-250 (與原廠 18-250 一樣的畫質 原廠加強過對焦行程較短 T行程較長)
如果版大不介意看英文，可以參考如下對比評測
http://www.newcamerareview.com/sony_cz_16_80mm_and_sony_16_105mmid222.html
結論為
If you don't really need the extra focal length, and need a little extra speed, and, like to look at your pictures at 100% screen size, just go out and buy the Carl Zeiss 16-80mm. For all others, get the less expensive Sony 16-105mm F/3.5-5.6.
Build quality. Both the same.
*Macro sharpness. 16-105mm, (barely) it also has 2" of extra distance.
*Image quality. Overall, the Carl Zeiss 16-80mm, barely.
*Distortion. The same, except for the long end, then it's the CZ, but not by much.
*Chromatic aberrations. CZ 16-80mm has a little better control.
*Bokeh. CZ better at 80mm F/4.5.
*Value. The same.
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X