lenstip的24mm f2.8锐度横向对比,sony vs tamron vs samyang

sony:
https://www.lenstip.com/603.4-Lens_review-Sony_FE_24_mm_f_2.8_G_Image_resolution.html
lenstip的24mm f2.8锐度横向对比,sony vs tamron vs samyang

tamron:
https://www.lenstip.com/586.4-Lens_review-Tamron_24_mm_f_2.8_Di_III_OSD_M_1:2_Image_resolution.html
lenstip的24mm f2.8锐度横向对比,sony vs tamron vs samyang

samyang:
https://www.lenstip.com/539.4-Lens_review-Samyang_AF_24_mm_f_2.8_FE_Image_resolution.html
lenstip的24mm f2.8锐度横向对比,sony vs tamron vs samyang

lenstip评测sony fe24mm f2.8G的总结:

We found several flaws as well; if you add them to the price, amounting to 700 Euro, you'll understand why the lens might be not as popular on the market as the Sony company would wish it to be. I think that, for example, few owners of 24-70 mm or 24-105 mm lenses will ever consider such a purchase. There are bigger chances that the owners of the Tamron 28-75 mm f/2.8 or the Sigma 28-70 mm f/2.8, presented not so long ago, might be tempted but once again the price point of the new Sony might prove to be a serious deterrent. After all the price tag of the Tamron is almost exactly the same as the price of the Sony FE 24 mm f/2.8G. If you are on a limited budget you'd rather look at such rival lenses as the Tamron 2.8/24 and the Samyang 2.8/24 – it's true they are less sharp but they are also almost two times cheaper.

Still, we wouldn't like to end this summary on a pessimistic note because the tested lens doesn't deserve it. It's a well-put-together, efficient instrument after all and, if you decide to buy it, we don't doubt you will be rewarded with really sharp photos.


另外加个batis 25mm f2:
https://www.lenstip.com/485.4-Lens_review-Carl_Zeiss_Batis_25_mm_f_2_Image_resolution.html
lenstip的24mm f2.8锐度横向对比,sony vs tamron vs samyang
2021-03-29 16:36 發佈
Samyang 24的銳利度是真的不高
但是裡面最輕最小最便宜的
稱職的機身蓋

湯姆龍最大,但有微距,畫質稍好

G鏡
也許想要體積小又兼顧畫質的人會花得下去?
Sony 這幾顆更注重錄影的使用.
sony 那顆只是中央畫質好而已,周圍衰減太快,還不如 tamron 那顆。
這幾張圖的比例有點不太一樣,
重新整合了一下比較清楚。

Sony這顆中央的銳利度並不差,
光圈全開的情況下,這顆畫質還是最好的
主要還是邊角變形率高達8.62%,數位校正之後畫質大幅下降。

Tamron整體來說比較平均,但體積也大了不少
至於同是餅乾鏡的Samyang把表格統一之後,
可以看出對比Sony遜色不少。

如果Sony這顆能再降價,
那它餅乾鏡的體積,加上畫質還有對焦速度還是有優勢在。





35ZA F2.8是120克
這幾個G鏡160/170克,考慮到大了1/3級還行
但要比35ZA的二手價同價時才會考慮
沒用過湯姆龍的24mm F2.8
但是35mm那支在A7II上對焦速度慢到一個只能說勉強堪用的程度
尤其AF-S很容易迷焦 AF-C又很吵
不過因為目前35小微距只有這顆所以我還是湊合著用
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?