FE24240是不是一隻物有所值的旅遊鏡?在看完吉姆林大大的評測文, 只有兩個感想,
一:吉姆林大大拍的真棒,拍照真的要靠腦袋, 高手不需頂級設備, 照樣拍的很好
二:「廣角端 / 望遠端」畫質測試, 看起來真是慘不忍睹, 看著我手中的FE24240, 幾乎是欲哭無淚。如果這隻鏡頭這麼糟, 為何吉姆林大大還可以拍的這麼好。
由於好奇心驅使, 小弟自不量力的再做了一次測試
拍攝條件:上腳架, 用快門線, 關防手震 ISO100, +0.7EV, 中央對焦
為了避免腳架晃動影響畫質, 小弟這次腳架是用Kingjue勁捷 C-K407 碳纖維腳架, 雲台則是用沙雀 SACHTLER FSB-8T 油壓雲台, 以減少腳架雲台造成的影響
DSC00358 by
ldg111, on Flickr
先看240端
原始圖檔
FE24240240mmF6.3 by
ldg111, on Flickr
在中間裁切一張1024*768千元大鈔區塊, 及右邊裁切1024*768百元小鈔區塊, 每張照片下面皆有標出焦段光圈, 將依序由F6.3 PO 到F22
FE24240240mmF6.3_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE24240240mmF6.3_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE24240240mmF7.1_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE24240240mmF7.1_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424240mm0F8_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424240mm0F8_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE24240240mmF9_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE24240240mmF9_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE24240240mmF10_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE24240240mmF10_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE24240240mmF11_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE24240240mmF11_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE24240240mmF13_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE24240240mmF13_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE24240240mmF14_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE24240240mmF14_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE24240240mmF16_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE24240240mmF16_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE24240240mmF22_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
個人是覺得240端中央及周邊都很利, 最大光圈級是可用光圈, 對一隻旅遊鏡來說, 簡直無懈可擊。
再來看看24端
原始圖檔
FE2424024mmF3.5 by
ldg111, on Flickr
一樣在中間及右邊各裁切一張1024*768區塊, 每張照片下面皆有標出焦段光圈, 將依序由F3.5 PO 到F22
FE2424024mmF3.5_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF3.5_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF4_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF4_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF4_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF4_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF5_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF5_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF6.3_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF6.3_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF7.1_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF7.1_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF8_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF8_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF9_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF9_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF10_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF10_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF11_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF11_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF13_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF13_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF14_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF14_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF16_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF16_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF18_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF18_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF20_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF20_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF22_crC by
ldg111, on Flickr
FE2424024mmF22_crR by
ldg111, on Flickr
24端畫質, 周邊果然差了一點, 我個人是覺得還可以接受, 如果它24端中央跟周邊一樣利, 那簡直可以稱之為神鏡了
拍完總算鬆了一口氣, 還好沒白花了冤枉錢,
拍完也有兩個感想
一:那個遮光罩有夠鳥, 裝上去在24端居然有暗角, 拔下來就不會
二:這隻鏡頭也沒有光軸偏移, 也就是一邊清楚一邊模糊現象, 不知道是不是便宜的變焦鏡組裝品質較差, 比較容易有光軸偏移的問題, FE2870如此, FUJI的 XC1655也是如此