• 9

dpreview NEX-5&NEX-3 vs. E-PL1 vs. GF1

幫大家整理一下,出處全為dpreview














Sony NEX-3Sony NEX-5Olympus E-PL1Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1
dpreview分類Entry Level Interchangeable Lens Camera / DSLRMid Range Interchangeable Lens Camera / DSLREntry Level Interchangeable Lens Camera / DSLRMid Range Interchangeable Lens Camera / DSLR
score 總分63%64%

69%69%
Conclusion - Pros 優點* Small, innovative designs that are still comfortable to hold

* High resolution sensor with excellent low-light performance (in PASM modes)

* Good JPEG output quality

* Great build quality (particularly NEX-5)

* Metal barrelled lenses feel impressive compared to peers

* Tiltable high-resolution screen

* Point-and-shoot interface that provides optional control of aperture

* Interesting extra features such as in-camera HDR and sweep panorama

* Good, clear live view magnification

* High quality video mode

* Built-in user guide (Shooting Tips)
* Excellent resolution with lots of detail in the shots

* Point-and-shoot interface that also allows user interaction

* Superb JPEG engine makes camera's full capability easily accessible

* Reliable metering and white balance (in natural light)

* Good AF performance (though kit lens holds it back)

* Hints of retro styling and SLR quality in a compact body

* Collapsible kit lens is small and offers decent quality

* Superb optional viewfinder aids stable holding and shooting in bright light

* Good high ISO performance and lots of control over noise reduction

* Full photographic functions available to users who want them

* Easy live view magnification good for using manual focus lenses

* Comprehensive feature set and impressive level of customization

* In-body image stabilization

* Easy to use, high quality video mode
* Superb resolution, excellent overall image quality up to ISO 1600

* Stunning raw output

* Reliable exposure and focus and generally reliable white balance

* Excellent build quality & great screen

* Surprisingly good handling, fun and easy to use

* Very compact design

* Intuitive user-interface that combines compact and DSLR features

* Large number of external controls including a very useful 'push-and-turn' dial

* Fast contrast detect Auto Focus (on par with entry level DSLRs)

* Lots of cool features (subject tracking, shutter speed simulation, movable live-histogram)

* Built-in flash and optional viewfinder

* iAuto mode works well - novice users should get decent results in 'point and shoot' mode

* HD video mode (though audio features pretty basic)

* Choice of two excellent kit lenses (zoom and pancake)

* Highly customizable - custom modes and many user-definable options and parameters

* Lens stabilization system very effective (but not all lenses have it)

* Comprehensive software package included
Conclusion - Cons 缺點* High ISO capability (a major advantage of its large sensor) unavailable in iAuto mode

* Constant overexposure of images wastes highlight capabilities (and no exposure compensation in iAuto mode)

* Lack of function menu makes settings changes in PASM modes unnecessarily long-winded

* Consumes battery very quickly if you use the screen a lot between shots

* Slow startup and poor shot-to-shot times

* No consistency of function or navigation between iAuto and PASM modes

* 'Bkground Defocus' feature encourages the use of wrong settings

* JPEG sharpening doesn't make the most of the camera's capabilities

* Very limited video control (no aperture control or exposure lock)

* Screw-on flash awkward to attach

* Screen very difficult to see in moderately bright light

* Auto HDR mode only available in PASM modes

* Live histogram unavailable when making exposure changes

* Magnified live view resets to center position after each shot (problematic for portraits)

* A lot of the 'Shoot tips' only teach you how to use iAuto mode

* Cheapest bundle (which only provides the 16mm lens) is not a good combination, particularly for beginners
* Some highlight clipping (and poor dynamic range at ISO 100)

* Low resolution screen that's hard to see in bright light

* No orientation sensor means having to rotate every portrait image manually

* Exposure controls slow and awkward to use (by DSLR standards)

* 1/2000th max shutter speed combined with base sensitivity of ISO 200 limits

you to small apertures in bright light

* i-Enhance picture mode can't be disengaged when using iAuto

* Complicated menu at odds with camera's easy-to-use philosophy

* Build quality and rear panel design a disappointment compared to more expensive PENs

* Preview image brightness doesn't always match the captured image brightness

* The most interesting Art Filters slow down operation (and make the movie mode virtually useless)
* Dynamic range and high ISO output not quite as good as best in class (including Olympus E-P1)

* JPEG output nowhere near as good as it could be - shoot raw for best results

* Default settings don't produce particularly appealing (JPEG) color

* Flash is very weak

* No in-body IS (and 20mm pancake not stabilized)

* Autofocus doesn't work with all legacy Four Thirds lenses

* Still a very limited range of dedicated lenses

* Orientation sensor uses lens IS system (so no automatic rotation of images shot with the 20mm or any other lens that doesn't have an IS module)

* Optional viewfinder is expensive (and could be smaller)

* Shutter lag long compared to an SLR (but good compared to a compact)
Sample Galleries

照片集
HereHereHereHere
當然還是要看一下價格(美金)

  • $599.99 (with 18-55mm zoom lens)

  • $549.99(with 16mm F2.8 pancake)



  • $699.99 (with 18-55mm zoom lens)

  • $649.99(with 16mm F2.8 pancake)


  • $599 (with 14-42mm)


  • $899 (with 20mm lens)

  • $899 (with 14-45mm lens)

2010-06-08 0:17 發佈
文章關鍵字 E-PL1 vs.
M4/3的價格要改成以現有價格來比較才合理吧。因為發售時間又不是差不多。

優點列出最少的剛好是缺點列最多的,優點列最多的,剛好是缺點最少的,這滿合理的,符合質量不滅定理嗎。
的確M4/3是有些優勢~不過以價格和分數來看
不成正比...

有點想笑.NEX5 和GF1分數差 5%價格卻讓人卻步~

如果Panasonic 來民調如果機身和鏡頭價格都降價~有人願意購買嗎?

我想應該滿多人要買~

其實買NEX主要是針對一般DC進階的人~並非專業~

如果你剛進踏進相機界~你想買是GF1還是NEX

我想應該是NEX.原因價格.輕薄.讓人驚艷全景連拍(我個人是喜歡全景和1080錄影)

至少我認為SONY在行銷部分..比任何一家都強~雖然CANON也滿會行銷..
剛看了一下... Nex5 輸在 :

操控(大輸)
功能(小輸..和操控有直接關係)
效率(小輸..同上)
Movie/Video Mode(小輸..這點不太了解為什麼)..

其它:
組裝(Nex5大贏, Nex3小輸)
Raw影像品質(小贏)
JPG影像品質(小小贏)
高ISO(大贏)
CP值(Nex5小贏, Nex3大贏)

難怪有人說Nex3/5如果改進操作方式(接近DSLR一點)..可以多10分


這張圖放上來看很明顯
贏的地方真的不多
APS的優勢在高ISO只有小勝
機身內JPG的影像處理也不夠好
當早已踏入單眼世界已久,或許價格就不會是考慮的主要
條件,畢竟4萬以上的鏡頭都在敗了。但是剛想入單眼之門
的新手,價格絕對是優先考量,因為或許會覺得自己若不想
玩也不會覺得花很多錢,而sony也看到各家玩家幾乎都有
鏡頭包袱,所以他在隨身機上當然就優先開發新手玩家,讓
sony單眼可以有一定市占率,畢竟老玩家考慮的會更多,而
不是只考慮價格。
求知若飢,虛心若愚(Stay Hungry,Stay Foolish)
其實4/3不是不好...

只是考慮到轉接老鏡後的等效焦長就...... 當然高ISO也是其一..

有耐心的可以等 Nex7/9哦..
Jetter wrote:
其實4/3不是不好....(恕刪)


nex7/9 效能強大的話 機身可能也就"增大"....機身如同epl1與gf1..
那時候搞不好又有 epl2 gf2
又比不完囉

nex7/9 要做得像nex5/3一樣小台 那又不知道要等多久

最近就是很煩
要送女王一台單眼機.女王6月生日說..(不管是單反,M4/3,4/3,EVIL)
女王又想要小台與眾不同
又要"有操作的"感


比來比去 我陷入大困難
G2..可惜只有日文介面...最想買
KX..有點久的機型..還是有點大台...目前最實際
GF1..和G2比起來死不降價
EPL1外型不符女王需求
EP2黑色..不要 EP1..對焦慢
550d.d5000.e450.a450...黑色否決

至於NEX5/3 我差點預購 但心想只是有APS-C 即可換鏡的 高規dC 且沒有"操作感"..要不真的很吸引我

唉!永遠比不完 心目中若 550d d5000 出白色的 紅色的 我就買給女王阿

抱歉..離題嚕!!
156alfa156 wrote:
nex7/9 效能強...(恕刪)


但550D/D5000體積就沒辦法小囉
E-P系列在軔體更新夠,對焦速度有增快,可以再參考看看
Jetter wrote:
剛看了一下... N...(恕刪)


小弟幾天前玩到了NEX5
我本身是a700的用戶
NEX5的選單可以輕易的在十分鐘內上手
並沒有外傳的那麼難用說
  • 9
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 9)
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?