widther wrote:乳摸就是乳摸,不是...(恕刪) 跟乳摸完全無關吧https://www.flickr.com/photos/carlzeisslenses/17123880790/一張在ZEISS的FLICKR上,鏡頭是BATIS 85mm的SAMPLE照,竟然是8910X6300,除非接圖或是拿60MP的機背來拍,否則以SONY FF E MOUNT來標示這張照片是怎樣......標錯了嗎畫素56MP,檔案卻只有16.6MB......我就當他是在測試工程機測試鏡頭
又出現了一張疑似A7R II + FE 55/1.8的照片,顯示59MP,不過原圖已被原PO移除http://camerarumors.info/update-sony-a7r-ii-confirmed-by-exif-data-full-resolution-is-9440x6300-59mp/
junk89 wrote:跟乳摸完全無關吧https...(恕刪) 你上一篇留言所引網址http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr4-did-zeiss-just-leak-the-sony-a7rii-with-56-megapixel-sensor/該網頁頭上"SONYALPHA RUMORS" 就清楚標在那裏文章開頭也註明"(SR3)"怎又跟乳摸完全無關了?怪咧?
byrianshih wrote:Horology w...(恕刪) "...distortion was traded off for uniformly high sharpness and a smaller/lighter design, knowing that the camera can correct for it automatically (or the raw converter).1.8/85 的 distortion 無法接受是指如果沒有機身或者是raw converter 修改。 有失有得,為了輕巧和銳利。