c230 wrote:
SONY短期內應該不...(恕刪)
Zeiss自己出的FE鏡會是手動鏡
diffusionless wrote:
消息來源?...(恕刪)
Zeiss will launch MF lens for E-mount
在Zeiss’ Facebook page上透露的
消息來源:SAR
diffusionless wrote:
消息來源?...(恕刪)
http://photorumors.com/2013/10/21/new-zeiss-touit-macro-lens-coming-soon/#more-50360
Zeiss is also working on new manual focus full frame lenses for the Sony a7/a7r models (from Carl Zeiss Facebook page):
"We are currently working on manual focus lenses for these new full-frame CSCs. They will have an interface to provide EXIF data to the camera. They are expected to be in stores by the end of 2014. However, we cannot provide any additional infos right now. Best regards, ZEISS Lenses Team"
我的相簿 http://www.flickr.com/photos/calatravayang
byrianshih wrote:
看看DPR的實拍照
鄉民毀譽參半
個人意見是
在超高畫素下
手震跟人物晃動 真的是個問題
A7R ZA35/2.8 1/60S 看起來不太安全
可能要1/100才比較保險
SONY一開始就說了
對於追求完美畫質的人
棚拍 (閃光燈) 自然景觀 (上腳架)
適合A7R
拍運動(拍小孩)快速對焦需求(拍小孩)
就適合A7
況且目前看起來
接RF廣角老鏡也是A7比較好
我還是用A7好了...
想想也是 如果因為平常使用高畫素須要拉高快門ISO來避免晃動
造成雜訊變多又拉低畫質 實在是沒什麼意義 不如放棄一點畫素來換取操作性
kuobba003 wrote:
剛剛確認了一下 , ...(恕刪)
而且思考過會發現 如果點不夠密也無法做到無間隙阿
01鄉民看不懂反話也沒念過理化 嘖嘖嘖
來自於Steve Huff
Steve Huff 本人的初步建議:
"In regards to Leica M Mount lenses using adapters…The A7r has issues with the 12, 15 and 21mm focal length, even 28mm to some extent. The A7 had some slight vignetting with the 15 and 21 but no real color shift. Not nearly as much as the A7r. So if you are one who was planning on using WIDE ANGLE Leica M mount glass, go for the A7.
The A7R offers pure power in resolution and that is about the only advantage it gives over the cheaper A7 (besides slight build on the dials). I love both but the A7 shutter is quieter, the AF is faster and the camera costs less and does better with wide angle Leica M glass!"
Steve Huff 的實拍照比DPR的高明多了
CV50/35 看起來都好毒~
ZM21就沒那麼驚艷...
可以看到A7+ZM35/2
看起來相當不錯
邊角有些微的色散
顏色 立體感 跟散景都很不錯
讚!
至於55/1.4就不說了
55/1.8 勉強考慮一下
(A7 1/60s 居然是安全快門?)
光圈全開的銳利度!
有點能了解到爲什麼Zeiss的鏡頭
不加防手震功能的原因
或許成本是個問題
但是為了追求極致畫質時
防手震可能會變成影響畫質的原因...
內文搜尋