Flickr 上 tsaileo53223 的 DSC01353-1
Flickr 上 tsaileo53223 的 DSC01356-1
伸縮遮光罩拉出來並調到最近對焦,
就變成那麼長一管......
Takumar 500mm f/5(1961-1965)
Takumar 500mm f/4.5(1965-1971)
Tele-Takumar 400mm f/5.6(1965-1971)
Pentax SMC Takumar-Zoom 135-600mm f/6.7(1972-1975)
賽桑 wrote:
Voigtländer的M接環應該都是日製的偽福吧?...(恕刪)
我覺得"偽福"措詞有些強烈？很像對岸德鏡基本教義派的用詞
"日福" 會不會好些？
網上也有不同的看法供參考 文章引用來源
========================
"Old" German Voigtlander Vs "New" Japanese Voigtlander: The new Cosina made Voigtlanders have nothing to do with the old German Voigtlanders, other than the name. The original German Voigtlander company, founded in 1756, was bought out and disemboweled by Zeiss in the late 1970's. Not long after, Zeiss stopped its own camera production, unable to compete economically with the Japanese (or was it just Karma's revenge for Voigtlander?). I am not sure how, but rights to the trademarked Voigtlander name eventually escaped Zeiss, to Ringfoto in Germany. Cosina (a Japanese manufacturer), successfully arranged to use the time honored Voigtlander name on their new series of Leica screw mount cameras and lenses.
Cosina's use of the Voigtlander name offended some longtime fans of the long deceased German firm. Disparaging words were more than a few, from some shortsighted "true" Voigtlander diehards. In answer to their cries of Cosina insults, I say "Nonsense." Whatever admiration the old Voigtlander firm deserves, they didn't survive. Dead companies don't make cameras.
While the new "Voigtlander" is hardly the same company as the "old" Voigtlander, the same is certainly true of today's Leica and Rollei companies, after each has been sold and resold a number of times. As far as I am concerned, Cosina is honoring the old German company by keeping its name alive with a new, innovative, quality lineup of cameras and lenses. Ironically, the old Voigtlander firm would have considered itself very fortunate to dominate a segment of 35mm market the way the new Voigtlander does today.
========================
賽桑 wrote:
Voigtländer的M接環應該都是日製的偽福吧?..(恕刪)
甚麼叫偽福...
講話可以好聽一點嗎?
voigtlander這個商標以及鏡頭設計專利就是被日商cosina買下繼續經營
不知道ZA和CZ算不算是偽蔡?
一些老鏡設計都以舊的設計加上新的技術重新呈現,價格也不高
以我出入過各廠幾顆M鏡的經驗是品質和"良率"一點也不輸leica (沒錯我是講良率)
小林社長這個RF愛好者還真正是做到身體力行,推出平價高品質的產品嘉惠大眾
你說的反差大不耐看,因為CV本來就是現代鏡頭
就算新世代的leica反差也大
如果你在意的是低反差請多找老鏡,老到脫模的leitz更佳 XD
另外可以參考這些讓我受益良多的評論..
http://six-wing-angel.blogspot.com/2008/11/blog-post.html
http://six-wing-angel.blogspot.com/2008/11/leica-summilux-m-11435mm-pre-asph.html
http://prosophos.com/2011/07/25/the-voigtlander-nokton-40mm-f1-4/
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X