• 4

FE廣角鏡選擇

A7R2+BATIS 25
100%檢視,我也覺得銳利度普普
firedragon wrote:A7R2+BATIS 25
100%檢視,我也覺得銳利度普普.(恕刪)



如果連batis 25都覺得不銳利
好奇那顆廣角鏡頭可以讓您滿意

firedragon wrote:
A7R2+BATIS...(恕刪)


若用 MC-11 加 Sigma 的 20F1.4 ART 呢??
小弟正準備入手中
沒別的意思
只是拍完照都用100%檢視照片
感覺好累

c230 wrote:
沒別的意思只是拍完...(恕刪)

這裡有兩層意思,一是拍照需不需要放大,二是鏡頭品質值不值得
如果拍完可以裁切,是不是多了更多創作的可能呢,當然拍照不會每張100%檢視,但是有需要放大的時候就發現模糊,變形,過渡差的場景,心裡會懷疑,這是42MP機器拍出來的嗎? 所以才有對鏡頭的無盡追求
當然照片有故事比照片銳利重要,但是都有不是更好? 如果以樓主要的超廣角來看,當然是拍到最重要,焦段21mm以上的直接淘汰了,推薦B25跟推薦FE90MG是一樣的無聊,至於利不利,測試網站只能看幾米內的近距離黑白各50%MTF,對廣角鏡來說那算少用距離,有需要的看實拍比較還比較準

有人在等這一顆嗎?







今天台中歌劇院開幕

看到記錄拍片團隊
也是用A7系機身配L鏡

另外可以再等原生FE16352.8GM...


firedragon wrote:
A7R2+BATIS
A7R2+BATIS 25
100%檢視,我也覺得銳利度普普
...(恕刪)


Dxo 更新了分數
參考一下
轉接的話原生a鏡SAL 16-35F2.8 ZA也不錯
只是大顆重了點,畫質比FE16-35 F4好很多喔!
撿二手又便宜,這顆好像被遺忘了
ephotozine Samyang AF 14mm f/2.8 review

測試機身A7R2

AF system is spot on, being fast, accurate and silent.

The lens returns an excellent set of figures, showing a very high level of sharpness. Images look crisp.
Centrally, sharpness is already very good at f/2.8 and f/4 and reaches an excellent level from f/5.6 through to f/16. It remains very good even at f/22.
The edges are very good from f/2.8 to f/8, excellent at f/11 and f/16 and very good at f/22. This is especially pleasing for an ultra-wide lens, resulting in a very even crispness from centre to edge.

CA (Chromatic Aberration) is highly corrected and the results are impressive, especially for such a wide lens. In most images there is no intrusive CA even at the edges.

Barrel distortion, measuring at -3.66%, is very obvious.(唯一的缺點)





參考一下 FE1635F4 A7R

  • 4
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?