看這個網頁對於高ISO的測試
拉到最下面, Print Quality上面那一段測試
看這裡其實不覺得NEX的高ISO有多好
When we originally looked at the Sony NEX-5's high ISO images, we thought a new benchmark had been set. Indeed, the images do look pretty good, and may actually set a new high mark for overall quality, but these detail crops show that it's not quite a complete coup. The chief rivals for the top spot continue to be the T1i and E-P1 at ISO 100, and the E-P1 and T1i at ISO 3,200. At 3,200 the T1i renders more lines in the Lager letters, but that's partially a function of its slightly higher resolution (14.2 vs. 15.1). I'd say the Sony NEX-5 is probably the most even performer we've seen to date in this price and size range.
Also consider that this test is not independent of lens quality, focus errors, and other variables, so again take this mostly as a comparison of what each camera was able to do with the best standardized optics we can muster. The Samsung NX10 used its very sharp 30mm f/2 lens. The Olympus E-P1 and Panasonic G2 used the rather excellent Olympus Digital Zuiko 50mm f/2 Macro lens. The Sony NEX-5, Nikon and Canon used our laboratory-standard Sigma 70mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro lenses, which are very sharp.
目前會去買m4/3的相機的人,圖的是什麼?
花了兩三萬也可以買到更好畫質和高iso表現的入門級單反機身了,
這一族群人卻要去買接近dc大小的m4/3系統相機?why?
小弟我認為這塊市場不能站在執意用單眼的思維模式來思考s家的nex到底會不會成功!
反而是站在想買m4/3的消費者或高階dc這族群人的想法來評價nex會比較客觀些..
就好比一兩年前,不是有不少單眼族也認為m4/3成不了氣候嗎?
結果如今呢?尤其p家的....不是令人跌破眼鏡!
所以不要小看s家對市場需求敏銳度!
反正我們也不知nex系列會賣得怎樣,
我們就靜觀其變囉!
我只希望這系列拍出來的不要鬆軟,也不要因為提高夜拍能力卻犠牲了高彩度就好了,
那將會是令人期待的好機了~
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X