Photozone評測出來,結果下
http://www.photozone.de/m43/961_olympus714f28pro?start=2
7-14mm F2.8整體結果沒有贏9-18mm多少,光學素質還是9-18mm表現比較好
應該說9-18很超值,但鏡頭用久,裡面線路會扯斷是一大缺陷
看來我的9-18mm還是將就點用吧,等Leica 100-400mm補進超望遠焦段
M.Zuiko Digital 9-18mm結果
http://www.photozone.de/olympus--four-thirds-lens-tests/529-oly_m918_456?start=2
wjesse wrote:
O家這支7-14應...(恕刪)
個人單純是因為7mm難駕馭,又9mm端變形較少,
如果畫質沒有差很多,沒必要把O9-18換成O7-14
在意畫質與7mm的廣度,或許P7-14是最好選擇
O7-14就看你需不需要更大的光圈帶來更容易拍攝的場景
相較之下日幣貶&降價後的P7-14應該是最值得現在入手
不過photozone的Panasonic 15mm F1.7評測怎麼遲遲未出來??
wjesse wrote:
O家這支7-14應...(恕刪)
photozone對這支PRO廣角最大的抱怨是像場彎曲
O/P 7-14的實拍比對可參考cameralab的比較測試
http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Olympus_M_Zuiko_Digital_7-14mm_f2-8/sharpness.shtml
Impressively the Olympus manages to match or slightly out-perform the already excellent Lumix G 7-14mm at the same focal length and aperture values. The Lumix can get very close on overall sharpness, but in some cases needs to be closed to f5.6 to do so. Meanwhile the Olympus will perform as well at f4 or in some cases f2.8, giving it a benefit of between one and two stops.
後段有詳細的實拍比較
http://www.mirrorlessons.com/2015/05/28/olympus-7-14-2-8-pro-review/
乘天地之正... 御六氣之变... 以遊無窮.......天地間任君攝影... 鏡頭中自有天地 .......
內文搜尋

X