CNet NEX-5N 評論
I don't know that I can recommend the NEX-5N as the best option for point-and-shoot upgraders; for that the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 offers the more familiar interface and performance worth stepping up to
我不知道NEX-5N是否是最適合給那些從P&S升級上來的; 與其相比GF3擁有比較熟悉的操作跟更好的效能
我只知道有些論壇被這個評論氣炸了 XD
Urahara wrote:
不好意思我查了一下字...(恕刪)
U大
不好意思，我不用翻字典
但很想知道您翻了哪本跟您說翻錯了
請燒了它吧，還是換一副眼鏡
直接貼上樓主提供的CNet NEX-5N 評論
I don't know(我不知道) that I can recommend(我可以推薦) the NEX-5N as the best option(NEX-5N是最好的選擇) for point-and-shoot upgraders(給P&S升級者); for that(給那...指P&S) the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 offers(GF3提供) the more familiar interface and performance(更親近的介面與性能) worth stepping up to(值得升級)
這樣看的懂嗎?還是小弟從新再翻一次
我不知道是否可以推薦NEX-5N為P&S升級者的最好選擇；以那P&S的性質，GF3提共更親近的介面與性能是值得升級的.....
那point and shoot指的是point，指向某個點....shoot，拍照。P&S應該算是隨意拍吧
記得下次要翻譯前，先找一本真的字典，玩具不算喔~~~
要不然就跟大家說說是哪裡有翻錯
thypig wrote:
U大
不好意思，我不用翻字典
但很想知道您翻了哪本跟您說翻錯了
請燒了它吧，還是換一副眼鏡
直接貼上樓主提供的CNet NEX-5N 評論
I don't know(我不知道) that I can recommend(我可以推薦) the NEX-5N as the best option(NEX-5N是最好的選擇) for point-and-shoot upgraders(給P&S升級者); for that(給那...指P&S) the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 offers(GF3提供) the more familiar interface and performance(更親近的介面與性能) worth stepping up to(值得升級)
這樣看的懂嗎?還是小弟從新再翻一次
我不知道是否可以推薦NEX-5N為P&S升級者的最好選擇；以那P&S的性質，GF3提共更親近的介面與性能是值得升級的.....
那point and shoot指的是point，指向某個點....shoot，拍照。P&S應該算是隨意拍吧
記得下次要翻譯前，先找一本真的字典，玩具不算喔~~~
要不然就跟大家說說是哪裡有翻錯
point and shoot 是指傻瓜相機
這句話只指出－對於要從傻瓜相機跳入可換鏡頭的使用者，GF3比NEX-5N適合。因為介面與性能比較類似傻瓜相機。
你按回報了嗎？
ntsan wrote:
CNet NEX-5...(恕刪)
CNET 的相機評論跟 Engadget 一樣.....不用太認真啦，很鳥的。等看看 DPreview 的比較實在。
thypig wrote:
I don't know(我不知道) that I can recommend(我可以推薦) the NEX-5N as the best option(NEX-5N是最好的選擇) for point-and-shoot upgraders(給P&S升級者); for that(給那...指P&S) the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 offers(GF3提供) the more familiar interface and performance(更親近的介面與性能) worth stepping up to(值得升級)
翻的不錯，很正確！
比較專業的人都會選CANON和NIKON
它們才是真的相機大廠
所以5N的評價會輸給GF3也很正常...
樓主說看到SONY用戶生氣 他們真的非常莫名奇妙
他給的結論說得很好呀：
The NEX-5 was a decent camera, and Sony's fixed a lot of our quibbles with it. Plus it takes the new A-mount adapter, and that should make shooters who just want a decent body on which to hang their expensive Zeiss glass really happy.
I don't know that I can recommend the NEX-5N as the best option for point-and-shoot upgraders; for that the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 offers the more familiar interface and performance worth stepping up to. And I think the body itself might be too small for some people looking for a dSLR alternative, and for some of those folks a hardware mode dial or traditional hot shoe can be a deal killer.
But it's a solid camera with extremely good video quality and capabilities for its class, and though its performance isn't best in class, it's certainly good enough. I only suggest that you try before you buy because it feels and operates differently than what you may be used to, and if you're not comfortable with it, it's hard to get good images from even the best camera.
算是很好的挑選相機通則
我習慣著，你的習慣。
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X