大家引頸企盼的DPreview E-5 review出爐啦, 竟然都沒人貼,
E-5 in-depth Review
DPR論壇已經一堆人認為, 這篇review宣告了4/3系統之死
有人認為評測很客觀公正, 就是DPR一貫的測法
有人則是認為DPR始終沒有著眼在4/3系統的優點上,
另外就是AF速度, 白平衡等並沒有客觀的數據
Overall Conclusion 簡單翻譯總結
Judged purely on its own merits the E-5 is a good and capable camera in most situations. But is it good enough to warrant swapping systems from Canon, Nikon, Pentax or Sony to Olympus? Or good enough that an uncommitted photographer wanting to get into DSLR photography for the first time might choose the E-5 over competitive offerings? Sadly, our answer to both questions has to be 'no'. But, perhaps more importantly, is the E-5 better than the E-3? Yes, definitely. Should E-3 users with a solid investment in the E system consider upgrading? Again, we have no hesitation in saying yes.
=> E-5沒有好值得換系統, E-3升級E-5倒是值得
Let's make on thing very clear from the outset: the Olympus E-5 is the best Four Thirds DSLR ever made. It offers a better feature set, better baseline image quality, better ergonomics and better build quality than any previous E-series camera. Although at its heart is a relatively old 12MP CMOS sensor, Olympus has managed to squeeze more resolution out of it than we would have thought possible. Low ISO shots taken in good light are outstandingly detailed, and in these conditions the E-5's AF, metering and WB settings (coupled with a very good JPEG engine) work well together, and make the E-5 a pleasure to shoot with.
=> E-5目前4/3系統的機皇, blah blah blah
There are frustrations though - for one, the E-5 is priced too high. Also, its sensor is relatively noisy, dynamic range is good but not as wide as we'd like, and the maximum continuous shooting rate is relatively slow. The E-5's menu system is a bit fussy, the lack of any meaningful customization in movie mode is frustrating, likewise unpredictable AF in multi-point mode. None of these issues is fatal by itself, but taken as a whole, they add up to a camera which just isn't quite good enough to compete in this market segment, especially given the strength of fresh-faced competitors like the Pentax K-5.
=> E-5缺點還是一堆, 綜合考量以上缺點無法與同級競爭者比拼 (例如K-5)
不知大家怎麼看,
小弟農曆年前才剛買E-5哩, 哈哈
看來, 又要繼續"默默選擇E-5了"
結論也算滿中肯的
E-5確實是目前43系統最佳的一部機身
但要吸引其它用戶投入43系統的魅力可能還不太夠
對手上已有素質極佳的ZD鏡使用者來說
有這部E-5還是會滿令人高興的
但面對其它各個廠商同期機種的競爭
數據上的相對弱勢也是客觀的事實
至於主觀的使用感受
那不在dpreview的測試重點中
所以這方面未提出什麼論述是滿合理的
kirisima wrote:
(恕刪)...目前只能希望OLYMPUS可以出一台像樣點,讓原本的4/3玩家可以轉接4/3鏡頭又不失其功能的專業級m4/3機身。
完全同意kirisima兄所說的
也同樣期待Olympus能給一臺提供ZD鏡良好轉接性的專業級M43機身
(內建高速電子觀景窗、ZD鏡轉接對焦速度達到E-4X0/5X0/6X0系列水準)
我的個人網站 goo.gl/bbs37a & 我的 www.flickr.com/photos/elf0724
內文搜尋

X