• 3

DPreview E-5 Review 出爐

大家引頸企盼的DPreview E-5 review出爐啦, 竟然都沒人貼,
E-5 in-depth Review
DPR論壇已經一堆人認為, 這篇review宣告了4/3系統之死
有人認為評測很客觀公正, 就是DPR一貫的測法
有人則是認為DPR始終沒有著眼在4/3系統的優點上,
另外就是AF速度, 白平衡等並沒有客觀的數據

Overall Conclusion 簡單翻譯總結

Judged purely on its own merits the E-5 is a good and capable camera in most situations. But is it good enough to warrant swapping systems from Canon, Nikon, Pentax or Sony to Olympus? Or good enough that an uncommitted photographer wanting to get into DSLR photography for the first time might choose the E-5 over competitive offerings? Sadly, our answer to both questions has to be 'no'. But, perhaps more importantly, is the E-5 better than the E-3? Yes, definitely. Should E-3 users with a solid investment in the E system consider upgrading? Again, we have no hesitation in saying yes.

=> E-5沒有好值得換系統, E-3升級E-5倒是值得

Let's make on thing very clear from the outset: the Olympus E-5 is the best Four Thirds DSLR ever made. It offers a better feature set, better baseline image quality, better ergonomics and better build quality than any previous E-series camera. Although at its heart is a relatively old 12MP CMOS sensor, Olympus has managed to squeeze more resolution out of it than we would have thought possible. Low ISO shots taken in good light are outstandingly detailed, and in these conditions the E-5's AF, metering and WB settings (coupled with a very good JPEG engine) work well together, and make the E-5 a pleasure to shoot with.

=> E-5目前4/3系統的機皇, blah blah blah

There are frustrations though - for one, the E-5 is priced too high. Also, its sensor is relatively noisy, dynamic range is good but not as wide as we'd like, and the maximum continuous shooting rate is relatively slow. The E-5's menu system is a bit fussy, the lack of any meaningful customization in movie mode is frustrating, likewise unpredictable AF in multi-point mode. None of these issues is fatal by itself, but taken as a whole, they add up to a camera which just isn't quite good enough to compete in this market segment, especially given the strength of fresh-faced competitors like the Pentax K-5.

=> E-5缺點還是一堆, 綜合考量以上缺點無法與同級競爭者比拼 (例如K-5)

不知大家怎麼看,
小弟農曆年前才剛買E-5哩, 哈哈

看來, 又要繼續"默默選擇E-5了"
2011-02-04 22:09 發佈
文章關鍵字 DPreview E-5 Review
安啦
盡信書
不如無書

選你所愛
愛你所選
新年快樂
事實證明了OLYMPUS要是拿不到夠好的CMOS或CCD,也變不出什麼花招。其實我個人認為,OLYMPUS沒有完全善用4/3片幅的優勢。

比如說以4/3這麼小的片幅,其反光鏡振動也小的情況下,應該可以做出比APS跟FF片幅來的更高速的連拍。

拿不出新CMOS來用,那也可以反應在售價上,降低高階機身入門的門檻。讓更多原本就是4/3系統的玩家可以更無痛的升級到高階機身。

只可惜OLYMPUS統統作不到。

目前只能希望OLYMPUS可以出一台像樣點,讓原本的4/3玩家可以轉接4/3鏡頭又不失其功能的專業級m4/3機身。

ApolloLin wrote:
大家引頸企盼的DPr...(恕刪)
dpreview這篇所測的內容一如往常
結論也算滿中肯的
E-5確實是目前43系統最佳的一部機身
但要吸引其它用戶投入43系統的魅力可能還不太夠
對手上已有素質極佳的ZD鏡使用者來說
有這部E-5還是會滿令人高興的
但面對其它各個廠商同期機種的競爭
數據上的相對弱勢也是客觀的事實
至於主觀的使用感受
那不在dpreview的測試重點中
所以這方面未提出什麼論述是滿合理的

kirisima wrote:
(恕刪)...目前只能希望OLYMPUS可以出一台像樣點,讓原本的4/3玩家可以轉接4/3鏡頭又不失其功能的專業級m4/3機身。

完全同意kirisima兄所說的
也同樣期待Olympus能給一臺提供ZD鏡良好轉接性的專業級M43機身
(內建高速電子觀景窗、ZD鏡轉接對焦速度達到E-4X0/5X0/6X0系列水準)
我的個人網站 goo.gl/bbs37a & 我的 www.flickr.com/photos/elf0724

kirisima wrote:
...(恕刪)


中肯, 幫你按個讚.

4/3 的確很多 "理論上" 的優勢到目前為止, 都還沒辦法出現在自家機皇上.
PS. 昨天發現, 35-100mm 比小黑六還重...
小黑六 F2.8 1500g
35-100mm F2.0 1650g
Nikon AF-S VR NIKKOR 200mm F2.0 2930g (更正)
小黑六要有F2.0大概重量和價格要翻不只一倍
先玩M4/3吧
GH2的16.05MP Live MOS Sensor can up to ISO 12800
再等等吧
Mooncat wrote:
4/3 的確很多 "理論上" 的優勢到目前為止, 都還沒辦法出現在自家機皇上

我也覺得疑惑,E3/E5體積重量也沒小多少,現在一些他牌的APSC機也都非常輕巧

ois99 wrote:
小黑六要有F2.0大概重量和價格要翻不只一倍

可是問題是小黑六不需要做到F2.0
ApolloLin wrote:
大家引頸企盼的DPreview E-5 review出爐啦, 竟然都沒人貼


昨天就看完評測,結論也跟想像的一樣,所以就沒貼上來了...
其實 DPR 測 4/3 應該都能想像到結果... 但會繼續選用 E-5 者,絕對不是為了那些數據或科學評測,而是不同的東西...
歡迎來我的 Blog: http://www.masaru-vision.net
yzubeggar wrote:
我也覺得疑惑,E3/...(恕刪)


35-100mm也不需要做到F2.0
他jpg 分數給那麼低我覺得很怪....不是色彩很好分數給7.5??
  • 3
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?