這m4/3系統還有個重點就是因為去除了反光鏡 所以他的鏡後距離是很短的 這讓許多RF鏡頭可以復活而不用一定要買M8 or RD1s(都很貴
) 雖然他沒有聯動測距器不能跟前面兩部真正RF相提並論 而必須要用LCD來對焦不過對於玩RF鏡頭的人來說 m4/3還是提供了一個好玩的老鏡數位化方案
vyeh wrote:
剛剛看了一下，外型先不說，因為每個人有每個人的菜很樂，
只是忽然想到，無奈啊咧…！沒有內閃，要死了喲喔~~
來自世界初的消息
http://www.olddo.com/bbs/redirect.php?tid=6160&goto=lastpost#lastpost
1.有內閃
2.有許多不同顏色
引述自dpreview
.....we're told that the design (complete with faux prism 'hump') is deliberately conservative; Panasonic's research has shown that its target market (particularly in Japan) still prefers a camera that looks like a camera is supposed to, and wasn't going to risk falling at the first hurdle by producing something too radical........
大意是P採保守作法,針對主要目標也就是日本市場對相機的既有印象,避免過於激進而產生風險
引述自imaging-resource
.....So, while the Panasonic G1 is definitely smaller than the smallest SLR on the market, it's not (yet) pocket-sized. On that topic, a senior Panasonic product planner who briefed us on the camera said that they actually could make even smaller bodies using the Micro Four Thirds standard, but they were concerned that US users in particular would find them too small. I suspect that's the case in general, but I'd bet that a really small "rangefinder-style" Micro Four Thirds camera would find a lot of takers among people looking for a very small camera for street photography and other traditional rangefinder uses.......
P高階產品規畫表明P可以做得更小,但考量老美會覺得太小了因而作罷,..但作者卻敢打賭RF風格的小型機對特定族群的強大吸引力....
引述自nikkeibp.co.jp
....因此，旁軸相機用戶其實僅限于相機愛好者。一般來說，這種相機最終都會變為難以使用的相機系統。....
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X